|
|
CONSUMER NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters Spanish |
|
|
|
AUTOMOTIVE
Dealers |
Manufacturers |
Service |
Warranties |
Lemon Laws |
Recalls |
Tires |
Transporters |
Racing
|
Mitsubishi - Air Bag |
|||||||
|
I took our 2000 Mitsubishi Diamante to the Miller Mitsubishi dealership located at 5319 Van Nuys Blvd. on 7/28/03. My husband and I purchased the car at this dealership, and have always kept our cars well maintained inside and out. I brought the car in for some standard maintenance namely, oil and filter change and an air conditioning inspection and service. Also, I inquired about the on/off again SRS light and as to why the front drivers side door would not close properly without first rolling down the window. I was informed that the car had troubles relating to the airbag. More specifically it had a faulty spring clock and module. That was surprising to hear for a car that is only 3 years old. However, what was more unbelievable was that we were told it would cost $982.00 to repair the faulty parts. My husband and I have owned many cars and have never experienced a problem such as this. We certainly understand normal wear and tear on moving parts on a vehicle. The spring clock and module are not moving parts and should not have failed before ever being used. I asked if Mitsubishi would stand behind their product. Basically, I was informed that the car was out of warranty. After long discussions with one of the employees, Randy in the service department, I was told they would drop the price to $800.00 – still an exorbitant amount – (or pay $85.00 for the estimate to get our car back if we decided not to replace the ineffective parts.) This car has never been in an accident. The airbag has never been deployed. Obviously, these are original defective parts. I asked Jay Akers (parts and service Director) if this has been a common problem with other customers. He replied that it was not. Therefore, my husband and I believe the company should in all fairness stand by the product for their customers and replace the two parts at their cost. A friend of ours also had problems regarding their airbag parts. Chrysler/Plymouth promptly replaced the parts with no charge to their customers. I drive my two daughters and myself in this car. This is an important safety issue concerning the air bag, which we want resolved by your company. I also have since learned that if I wanted to sell this car, a smog check could not be performed until the SRS light problem is resolved. My husband I were considering purchasing a Mitsubishi SUV, yet so far the lack of loyalty to stand by its cars and customers after a car is sold off the lot is very disconcerting and at this point would not consider doing follow up business nor recommend Mitsubishi to our family and friends. Dean of Charlotte NC (12/30/01):
On their own, they had gotten a recommendation from the Chevy dealer next door that they tried so they could avoid this. They got a Camaro defroster kit from the Chevy guys, and tried to use that to replace the wiring/connector, but after gluing it in, the service guy tested it, and the defroster still did not work. The service rep told me he would speak with the district service manager about this, determine next coarse of action, and call me. This never happened. About 2 weeks after I got my car back, I noticed that they had damaged the top while it was in the shop that day. One of the snaps that connects the inside top liner with the outer liner back next to the rear window had been ripped out of the cloth. When I went back in to get the airbag replaced on 12/26/01, I pointed this out to them, and the service guy just looked at me like I was stupid. I asked about the rear defroster as well, and he mentioned that since I was the second owner, it may be an issue. He said that Mitsubishi did not like to replace tops for rear window defroster failures for second owners, as there may have been neglegence I did not know about. I mentioned that the car was still under warranty, and he repeated the comment. He said that since it was a separation of the wiring, it may not be an issue. After arriving at home after dropping my car off, I immediately called MMSA and spoke with a customer servive rep. After explaining the situation, she called the service manager, who assured her that everything would be fixed that day. When I went back to get my car that night, I was told that the rear defroster was working, but I should not use it for 24 hours to allow the glue to dry. I asked about the liner snap, and he said that it went right back in to place. After getting home, I got back there to see if the snap was fixed, and he had lied. The snap did not go back in, they made another hole and put the snap in there. Does not seem very stable to me, and I would assume that if I ever took the car to aother dealer for top work, they would invalidate the warranty based on this. Also, I tested out the rear defroster for the first time today (4 days after picking it up) and it still does not work. Appears they tried another Camaro kit in my car. If I wanted a Camaro, I would have bought one. I expect my car to be restored to the condition it was when it left the factory. April of Frederick, MD, writes:
Report Your Experience
|
||||||
Back to the top | Automotive Section |
|||||||
Advertisement
|
Home |
Complaint Form |
News |
Recalls |
FAQ |
|
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|