|
CONSUMER NEWS RECALLS COMPLAINT FORM SCAM ALERTS |
| Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish | |
|
|
Allegiance Telecom |
||||
|
Wendy of Painted Post NY (04/29/08) Lynn of Walnut Creek CA (04/05/08) Ian of Austin TX (03/16/08) Megan of Seattle WA (02/19/08) Duane of Superior WI (02/05/08) Charles of Bowie MD (02/04/08) James of Glenside PA (02/08/06) Kipper of Jupiter FL (01/24/05) Jay of Kent WA (07/13/04) Pm of Pittsburgh PA (02/19/04) Roberto of Seattle WA (02/12/03) Jennifer of Chicago IL (06/07/02) Neal of Redmond WA (3/6/03):
To keep a long story short this went on until the end of July 2002. I finally contacted the State of Washington Utilities Commission. The 411 listing was finally turned on the last day of July. I know this because I started calling 411 almost daily. I also heard from a customer that I wasn't listed in the new phone directory in the Business White section. I checked it out and called Allegiance at their local office several times but no one would return my calls. After repeated calls I finally got to talk with a local sales manager who could only offer me $100 in compensation, that was his limit. He told me to file a grievance at the Allegiance 800 number and a corporate officer or manager would contact me. I filed same, got a case number, and told them to have a corporate manager contact me. Nothing happened, so I stopped paying my bill. I called them repeatedly, and the last time I called they told me that my case number was closed. I told them to reopen it and have a mananger contact me immediately. No one ever called. I was not geting anywhere with Allegiance since they would not talk to me, so my only alternative was to call Verizon and request that my lines be switched back, which cost me all those fees again. Before Verizon could switch the lines (apparently they need ten days for the other carrier to release the lines) I just happened to find that two of my lines were dead (for how many days I'll never know). Apparently Allegiance saw fit just to cut me off, unknown to me. I guess that's why I got customer calls telling me my lines have been busy. I called Verizon as soon as I found out that two of my lines were dead. Verizon came through and were able to get me back on line the same day I called. In fact the technician that did the work gave me his personal number in case I had any further problem. I received a notice from Allegiance to pay my bill or be cut off. I replied to those letters by calling Allegiance and sending the bills back asking to speak with a manager. I figured they can't cut me off anymore since they no longer have my lines. They continued to send bills for a few months. I just got a call on March 4, 2003 from Nationwide Recovery Service demanding payment (they offered to collect 50 cents on the dollar). I told them I wasn't about to pay anyone a dime for my frustration. I explained my problem to Nationwide, and explained that Allegiance has continued to ignore my request to talk with a mananger or to get some kind of compensation for my loss of business due to their negligence. Nationwide (agreed with me) and said they would close it at their end and send it back to Allegaince. Then on March 6, 2003 I got a letter (request for payment) from Nationwide, to which I have replied that I dispute the bill, with a shortened version of why. I'm very frustrated. Allegiance told me many times the 411 thing was fixed, even when it wasn't. Allegiance totally ignores their customers, they never return phone calls. Allegiance does not make outgoing calls to their customers. Allegiance credit department does not make phone contact to inquire about nonpayment, they just turn it over to outside collections. Allegiance only informs their customers with one letter that nonpayment could terminate thier sevice, then they terminate it without any further contact letting thier customers find out after the fact. I have no idea how many customers I may have turned over to my competitors due to not being able to get our phone number from 411 Information for approximately six months. I have no idea how many customers I may have lost that assume we are out of business since were not listed in the Business Section of the Qwest phone book. We've lost this listing for a full year now until the new books come out. Neal should pay the bill, then sue the company in Small Claims Court for the disputed amount plus any costs he incurred. Roberto of Seattle (2/12/03):
We had to sign a doccument that released Qwest from servicing our salon and allowed Allegiance to proceed. We did, and a few days later our service began. It went pretty smooth, but we did have a problem and called Megan for assistance. Megan said if we ever had any problems at all to call her, she would be there to help. Well, she wasn't there any more she had moved on. That was fine, we solved our own problem. Five months later Qwest Communications called and said they would give us 3 free months if we came back. We did. We gave Qwest all the information again for hook up and they said we would be back with their service on a certain day. Allegiance disconnected our service early that that morning Quest was to take over, and we did't have service till late that afernoon. Mean thing to do on Allegiance part. It was not a good roll over. The first week of January 2003, we received a Bill from Allegiance Telecom stating that we owe them $1,463.73 for early termination. I imediately called their Texas office to complain. That is where the bill was addressed from. I said we have a problem, I have this bill. She said you have a problem because I had signed a two-year contract. I was stunned. I went to my files, to find Megan had checked a small box in the papers I had signed that said two years. I never agreed to a two-year contract. I would never. I'm 55 years old and not that ignorant. I've been swindled by a fast-talking representative of Allegiance. Molly of San Francisco (10/9/02):
During the period when we were negotiating with Allegiance sales personnel, we discussed our concern with experiencing any interruption of service in the ATM lines. They promised us that we would be involved directly with which lines were switched over during the trial period and that they would notify us of the switchover dates so we could make sure that there was no interruption. It was agreed upon that we were only switching over a dozen ATM lines during the first switchover so we could be certain that there were no problems. Shortly after the first ATM lines began to be switched we experienced immediate interruption of the phone line to the ATM. We notified them daily of these problems, however, their technicians claimed that these must be problems with the ATM. Having been part of the process of installing phone lines for 6 years, we were certain that the problem was that the end of the ATM line at the Min. Pt of Entry was not moved from the binding post of our previous carrier into Allegiance's binding post. We notified them of this on every problem switchover, however, the technicians did not understand this very basic industry knowledge. On June 18th we sent them a "Cease and Desist" for service, well ahead of the 9/28/02 180-day outdate. We received no response to this letter or to the numerous phone calls made to the SF branch and to customer service. In fact, Allegiance subsequently began the process of picking the rest of our 250 lines without our knowledge or approval. on Oct 8th we received a letter from Allegiance demanding that we pay them $12,133.41 in past charges, most of those incurred after that June 18th "Cease and Desist" date. And they will not release the remainder of our lines so that we can switch them back to a reputable carrier AND they are threatening to shut our remaining lines off on Oct. 13th if they do not receive the $12,133.41 payment! Sounds a bit like blackmail! The economic consequences have been lost revenue from the ATMs during the switchovers. This amount is difficult to calculate at this point because Allegiance will not release the switchover dates that occured since June 18th to us. Obviously to protect themselves. We can only estimate the lost revenue at approximately $20,000 and the fees for switching back to a reputable carrier to be $16,000.00. Molly's company should turn this over to its legal department -- fast. Rosa of New York, NY (9/20/02):
I work online with tickets, insurance, money transfers atc. And I have lost many clients because of this. They have left because i could not provide timely service for them. Therefore, this has affected my business. Chris of Lynnfield MA (8/7/02):
Verizon charged the company about $1,600.00 in termination fees. I looked to Allegiance to credit my account the fee and I would pay Verizon. I discussed this with the Boston office Manager and he agreed. It is now August and they still have not processed the credit. I have refused to pay for any service since I would never have switched and I will have to pay fees to switch back to Verizon if Allegiance ultimately refuses. I have kept a diary of calls and letters, inlcuding a copy of the service termination agreement, dating from April thru August with the Boston, New York and lately the Texas office. To date they have refused to process my credit and now have issued a service suspension on 8/14/02. At this point I am dealing with someone in the "executive offices" in Texas to help in this matter, however they keep telling me it must be resolved in the Boston office. The problem is no one in the Boston office returns calls. And now the Texas contact has stopped returning calls. How do I deal with a company that has an agreement stating they are responsible for the charges, I have sent a copy of the agreement 3 different times and they still refuse to acknowledge the credit due? I am not even mentioning the downtime of 4 times in as many months for all office communicaitons. Sometimes for 2 days, in which the business calls are call forwarded to a cell phone. Do you have any suggestions on how I can break through this mess?? Again they have issued a service suspension notice for 8/14/02. I and other staff members have spent numerous hours since 4/02 trying to resolve the problem. Taking us away from jobs that we are paid to do. I have not even thought of the costs during our numerous system outages Telecommunications contracts are complex and companies like Allegiance are skilled at tying customers in knots. Chris should turn this over to the meanest lawyer she can find. Jennifer of Chicago (6/7/02):
Never mind all those extra pages, Jennifer. This says it all. Donna of Alpharetta GA (12/17/01):
Finally, Allegiance switched over one of our lines, but not the other. They said they didn't have enough lines in our area to switch over the other, which makes me question why they had marketed to us at all. That continued for months and then they, out of the blue, switched over the second line. We had constant outages and it would take days for Allegiance to address the problems. They seemed totally unconcerned about loss of revenue and the inconvenience we were experiencing. At one point, I was involved in a campaign to pass a state law to help disabled children. I was the primary contact for this, and I had calls and correspondence out to numerous legislators. The phones were dead for four straight days during this period and nothing I said seemed to light a fire under the Allegiance repair people. I contacted the regional customer service people as well as the company's headquarters. Nobody helped us. Whenever we would call and complain, we would be told that someone would contact us about a repair, but no specifics about time and date would be given. This happened over and over again. At our place, we no longer called the company "Allegiance", as all of us became so full of hatred for them that we referred to them as "f***ing Allegiance." We are not prone to foul language, but we were driven to the brink of violence by these people. We decided to switch back to Bellsouth, but Allegiance was so uncooperative, that it took 6 months to get it switched back. Allegiance kept delaying the switchover date. After we threatened legal action, Allegiance finally released the line. We lost income, opportunities, and had to work twice as hard to try to make up for the time which was lost when we had no way to communicate with the outside. I was driven to tears and hysterics on occasions by the lack of response to our outages. Allegiance should be stopped. They are a menace.
Candace of Wellesley, MA, writes:
This went on for sometime (my pleas for help from Allegiance going ignored) until I contacted BellSouth and asked them why it was happening. BellSouth advised that I did not have enough call forwards on my main telephone number. Allegiance Telecom advised that they could do nothing about the problem because they had no control over my main number. I told them that they would have to be able to solve my problem because BellSouth advised that they owned all my phone numbers including the main number. I told Allegiance, after putting up with weeks of busy signals and calls being dropped that I was going to switch service if they didn't solve the problem. They increased the number of call forwards I had on my main line and told me to disregard if BellSouth charged me extra for the increase -- Allegiance telecom would pay for it. BellSouth did begin to bill me extra... a total of $3,000 extra until I got tired of Allegiance's promises to pay, which they never did, and BellSouth's threats to pull my service if I continued to refuse to pay. So I paid BellSouth the $3,000 and changed service from Allegiance to LEC. I continue to get bills from Allegiance for service that was terminated months ago. Allegiance claims that LEC did not cut off service when they cut in my new T-1 line. Allegiance claims I owe them in the area of $6,000 dollars. I have sent them a letter advising that I lost thousands of dollars of business because of Allegiance's terrible service and wasted thousands of dollars more on radio ads in which people could not contact me because of faulty phone service. I am awaiting a response at this time to my letter, which demanded they consider I owe them nothing and to stop all contact with me or my company. Several of my people were on the verge of quitting because trying to make deals on the phone, which is my business's life's blood, was nearly impossible. I lost countless thousands of dollars in business with people I could not reach, or more frankly could not reach me, and wasted thousands of dollars in radio ads. Switching local carriers is extremely risky. Unless you can go to your own T-1, as William is now doing, your new carrier will most likely be re-selling the Bell carrier's facilities, which is a recipe for confusion and disaster. We would advise William to be sure his lawyer is up to date on this episode. Telecom companies tend be very hard-nosed and litigious. Dora of San Francisco (7/30/01):
Once the lines were figured out, none of the services we ordered were active. I took 2 weeks to get our telephone system up and running. This is a business, and even ONE HOUR of lost time is unacceptable. Then came the T-1 line, again, nobody knew what was going on. We finally had internet connection 3 weeks after it was promised. So for the first 5 weeks after we started with their service, we had no internet access. The 800 number for customer support does no good half of the time. Every time I order a trouble ticket (which is usually about every 2 weeks), they look up my account and see the list of numbers that were assigned to me but not ordered with PB. Then I have to go through the same story every time on what happened with my numbers. Last Friday, suddenly, 2 of my numbers were disconnected, one being my main number. I lost all incoming calls from Friday at noon to Monday at 10am. If I didn't follow up and call them every day, twice a day, I would have no phones. Nobody knows their head from their rear and nobody could help me. It takes repeated calls, emails, and then more calls to get anything done...many days behind schedule or expectation. Michelle of Santa Ana CA (1/23/01):
On Monday, January 16th, we noticed that our office was not receiving incoming calls. We were however, able to make outgoing calls. Because we assumed that the switch had not yet taken place, we contacted Qwest, our previous carrier. They informed us that Allegiance took over on January 9. After a week of finger pointing by Allegiance, Qwest and our phone vendor McMahon Comm, it seemed clear that Allegiance had not setup our service correctly. I then left a voicemail message for the salesman, Nicole, two for her manager, Patty and one for her manager, Bill. No one returned a single call. When I called their office on January 23rd I was placed on hold for 25 minutes, no one would speak with me until I said that I would come down to the office and wait for a rep. It has been seven days and the problem still has not been corrected. I could live with a mistake in programming or service but I cannot accept the gross unprofessionalism displayed by this company. Our experience with Allegiance has been a gigantic negative! We are a service company and we receive many calls a day from customers that need service. The week before this happened, we notified our customers of a price increase and asked they contact our office if there were any questions or concerns. Because they were not able to get thru, we received several voicemails from angry customers that wanted to cancel. It is not possible to determine at this time what financial consequences we will face because of these events. Lauren of Oakland CA (11/15/02):
| |||
Advertisement
|
Home |
Rogues Gallery |
Good Guys |
Complaint Form |
News |
Recalls |
Search |
Video |
FAQ |
|
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. |