|
CONSUMER NEWS RECALLS COMPLAINT FORM SCAM ALERTS |
| Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish | |
|
|
|
FINANCE:
Annuities |
Banks |
Credit Cards |
Debt Collection |
Debt Counseling |
Insurance |
Investing |
Loans |
Mortgages |
Payday Loans |
Tax Prep
|
World Mortgage |
|||||||
|
Diane of Moorpark, CA, writes:
Much to my surprise, in early December, upon calling the Texas office, I was told it appraised at $285,000. I requested a copy of the appraisal and received it 3 weeks later. On January 20, 1999, I replied with a request to appeal the appraisal. My reasons were that
In early February 1999, I was informed that the Appraisal Manager was sticking by the $285,000 appraisal because
Even after calling again and requesting this be put in writing, it has not been. Realtors that I work with have pointed out that there are higher selling comparable properties that were either not in PUDs or the PUDs had no amenities, i.e., pool. No realtor in the office has ever been told by a client that they did or didn't want to live on the "other side" of the street the appraiser used as a condition to compare the sale. I can only wonder how many people World has ripped off by using their in-house appraisers to deflate values so homeowners don't meet the 80% LTV ratio. I think some checking might indicate the need for a class action suit. Further, although World may be meeting the letter of CA law regarding removal of PMI, they certainly aren't meeting the intent of the law. I am still paying $204/month for PMI that I should not have to pay. I have spent endless hours trying to resolve this and am out the $275 appraisal fee. Report Your Experience
|
|
|||||
Back to the top | Mortgage Companies | |||||||
Advertisement
|
Home |
Rogues Gallery |
Good Guys |
Complaint Form |
News |
Recalls |
Search |
Site Map |
FAQ |
|
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. |
|