|
CONSUMER NEWS RECALLS COMPLAINT FORM SCAM ALERTS |
| Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish | |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Banks Charging Both Parties in Bad-Check Transactions | ||||
|
WASHINGTON, July 27, 1999 -- Bounce a check and your bank will hit you with a $20 or $30 fee. Everybody knows that. But now, banks are also slapping fees on recipients of bum checks, as the Rev. Kathleen Anderson recently learned the hard way. She was paid by check for performing a wedding and cashed the check at the First National Bank of Maryland, where she has an account. The check bounced and, although it couldn't be troubled to notify her, the bank charged the Rev. Anderson $2.50. The bank defended the practice by saying the fees are "standard practice in the banking industry" and are intended to cover the added costs of handling a bum check, but Anderson was not mollified. "I was plenty angry," she told the Washington Post's Bob Levey. "Am I stupid of just naive?" The American Bankers Association confirmed that banks now routinely charge recipients of bad checks, even though the recipient bears none of the blame.
|
File A Complaint All complaints get a free legal review. In many cases, we're able to refer you to someone who can help. We also review all cases to see if they have class action potential. Click here to file your report.
|
||
| Back to the top | ||||
Advertisement
|
Home |
Complaint Form |
News |
Recalls |
FAQ |
|
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|