|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
"Diamond Club" Scheme Shut Down |
||||
|
WASHINGTON, Nov. 6, 2001 -- Financial Services of North America, Inc. has agreed to pay $239,793 for consumer redress as part of a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission to resolve allegations that they engaged in the deceptive telemarketing of advance fee VISA or MasterCard credit cards. The defendants claimed that for a $99 fee, consumers with credit problems were guaranteed to obtain major credit cards. Instead of receiving the promised credit cards, however, consumers received a membership in the "Diamond Club," a merchandise-purchasing club. In addition to paying consumer redress, the proposed settlement would prohibit the defendants from misrepresenting any fact material to a consumer's decision to purchase any good or service. The defendants were named as part of a law enforcement sweep targeting corporations and individuals that falsely promised consumers loans and credit cards for an advance fee. It is a violation of federal law to request or receive a fee from a consumer in advance of obtaining a loan or other extension of credit when the seller has guaranteed or represented a high likelihood of success in obtaining or arranging for a loan or extension of credit. The FTC filed its complaint in June 2000 in federal court alleging that the defendants violated the FTC Act and the Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR) by misrepresenting, among other things, that after paying defendants a $99 advance fee, consumers would receive a major credit card. Instead of delivering the promised credit cards, the defendants mailed consumers a letter welcoming them to a merchandise-purchasing club. The defendants also sent consumers a credit card application to a South Dakota bank, which often required consumers to pay additional application fees. Further, the complaint alleged, the defendants debited many consumers' bank accounts without their authorization, and, in other instances, they debited consumers' accounts in amounts exceeding the amounts authorized by the consumers. |
|||
Back to the top | Consumer News | ||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|