|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
Epic Resorts Ordered to Pay Refunds |
||||
|
WASHINGTON, Sept. 5, 2001 --Many consumers who bought travel packages from Epic Resorts and its subsidiary Epic Travel will be getting refunds within the next few weeks, under the terms of a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). Under the order, the companies are required to refund the money of customers who requested, but did not receive, their refunds within a 30-day cancellation period. The Commission filed its complaint in U.S. District Court in Florida against Epic Resorts and Epic Travel as part of the August 2000 "Operation Travel Unravel" law enforcement sweep of companies allegedly engaged in travel fraud and violations of the FTC Act and Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR). The order also enjoins the defendants from failing to make required travel-related disclosures in the future and prohibits them from violating the "Do Not Call" provision of the TSR, as well as the Truth in Lending Act (TILA). According to the Commission's complaint, Epic Resorts, Epic Travel, and the companies' owner and president, Thomas Flatley, violated the FTC Act and the TSR by misrepresenting that consumers had won or were specially selected to receive a vacation, misrepresenting the total cost of vacation packages, and failing to disclose material conditions and restrictions on the use of the packages. In addition, the complaint alleged that the companies, which sent out unsolicited faxes and e-mails to consumers who had registered to win vacations, failed to disclose material costs and restrictions concerning the vacation packages before consumers paid for them, as required by the TSR. The company also was charged with violating the Rule's "Do Not Call" provision by continuing to call customers who had asked not to be contacted. The complaint marked the first time the Commission alleged a violation of the "Do Not Call" provision of the TSR. |
|||
Back to the top | Consumer News | ||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|