CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

FTC Halts Bogus "Gold Card" Scheme



WASHINGTON, Nov. 6, 2001 -- An operation that deceptively sells its gold card by representing that it is a MasterCard or Visa has been shut down by a U. S. District Court at the request of the Federal Trade Commission.

According to the FTC, the defendants enticed consumers who had negative credit histories with promises of high credit limits and zero percent interest rates. Instead, the "merchant card" they provided only allowed users to purchase items from the defendants' Web sites or catalogs. The defendants' assets have been frozen and a receiver has been appointed pending trial on FTC charges that the scheme violates federal law.

The FTC complaint names Salyon, Inc., d/b/a First Liberty Financial, Salyon National Credit, Shop Salyon, Quicklinks.com, and their principals, Mark Joseph Lyon, John Donald Lyon, and Kurt Charles Uhler. The defendants are based in Aliso Viejo, California and Lake Forest, California.

The FTC alleged that the defendants targeted consumers with negative credit histories, using pitches like, "You can re-establish your good credit!" and "Account Status: APPROVED GOLD CARD." For fees ranging from $49 to $64, the defendants offered "pre-approved" credit cards with $15,000 credit limits, and zero percent interest rates for the first year.

Their mailings claimed that consumers who posted a favorable payment history with the new card would have these payment histories reported to the three major credit reporting agencies. They also claimed that consumers who maintained a favorable payment record would be issued a MasterCard with even better terms -- a lifetime zero percentage rate.

According to the FTC, the defendants failed to disclose that the cards they issued could only be used to purchase items from their own catalogs and Web sites, and that consumers could only charge 30 percent to 50 percent of the purchase price. They had to pay the remainder using a check or money order. Consumers only learned the cards were not full service credit cards after they had paid the defendants, the FTC alleged.


Consumer News

September 8 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts



FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.



Back to the top | Consumer News



Advertisement


Home | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds |


Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.