CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

20 Years of Stonewalling

Ford Settles Ignition Suit



October 25, 2001
After nearly 20 years of wrangling, delaying tactics and legal maneuvering, Ford Motor Co. has finally agreed to pay for replacing faulty ignitions on millions of Broncos, Explorers, Escorts, Mustangs, Tauruses and other cars and trucks.

Earlier Stories
August 15, 2001
Oct. 11, 2000
Dec. 20, 1999

The settlement reached in a San Francisco-area court will cover nearly 23 million vehicles produced from 1983 to 1995, about 9 million of which are no longer on the road. The ignition system was placed too close to the engine in the affected models, causing the cars to overheat and stall.

The settlement could cost Ford as much as $2 billion if all the vehicle owners come forward to collect an average payment of $160 to cover parts and labor. Besides California, the settlement covers similar class-action lawsuits in Alabama, Maryland, Tennessee and Washington.

Ford has fought the case every step of the way, angering auto safety activists who said the delays allowed an unsafe condition to persist. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration studied the case but ultimately declined to order a recall, further angering safety advocates.

Clarence Ditlow of the Center for Auto Safety praised the settlement, saying it sends a message to automakers that "it's no longer cheaper to stonewall than recall." Former NHTSA Administrator Joan Claybrook said the case shows the importance of consumer class action litigation as a way to hold companies responsible when government fails to act.

On Oct. 11, after more than six months of trial in Alameda County Superior Court, Judge Michael E. Ballachey affirmed an earlier decision which found that Ford had engaged in "massive consumer fraud" by "concealing a serious safety defect" from consumers and regulators. Ballachey, who earlier speculated that Ford was living in an "Alice in Wonderland" dreamworld, had also ordered Ford to recall and repair affected vehicles in California. The recall issue is still outstanding but under the terms of today's settlement, Ford agreed to pay for repairs on all affected vehicles.

"The evidence that Ford intentionally concealed this safety defect from the public was overwhelming," said co-lead plaintiffs counsel Jeffrey Fazio of Hancock Rothert & Bunshoft LLP. "It is time for Ford to ... make good on its promise to act in the best interests of consumers."


Consumer News

August 20 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts



FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.



Back to the top | Consumer News



Advertisement


Home | Rogues Gallery | Good Guys | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | Search | Video | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds | Radio | Job Postings




Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.