|
CONSUMER NEWS RECALLS COMPLAINT FORM SCAM ALERTS |
| Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish | |
|
|
Suit: HP Gouges Inkjet Users |
||||
|
October 17, 2001
While HP has fought off numerous inkjet-related suits from competitors, this is the first major consumer class action to challenge HP's practice of requiring consumers to buy a new print head every time they need ink. Industry analysts say that by "tying" ink refills to print head purchases, HP is able to charge about $30 for ink cartridges that would otherwise cost less than $10. It's a highly profitable business for HP, which reports that printer supplies have generated nearly 40 percent of corporate profits in recent years. "HP is conspiring against the consumer," Jones argues. He says consumers could choose competing products with lower-cost ink supplies if they were more fully aware of the longterm cost of inkjet cartridges. He notes that the cost of inkjet cartridges continues to rise while printer prices fall.
Courts have upheld the right of consumers to refill the cartridges as well as the right of companies to sell refill kits. But since there's no refill cap, the process involves using a syringe to inject ink into the cartridge, a messy and unappealing process. HP's main competitors, Epson, Canon of Xerox, also make inkjet products, most of which use separate ink containers and print heads. Jones' suit is pending in the state Superior Court in San Francisco, alleging that HP has violated California's Cartwright Natiturst Act by conspiring to restrain trade in the inkjet marketplace. In March 2000, the court certified the case as a class action in California and 18 other states, including New York and Illinois. |
|||
Back to the top | | ||||
Advertisement
|
Home |
Complaint Form |
News |
Recalls |
FAQ |
|
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|