CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Credit Card "Protection"
Scams Shut Down



October 1, 2002
Two Canadian citizens and the five corporations they operated will pay $436,000 to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that they tricked consumers into paying as much as $299 for one of two worthless credit card "protection" packages and laundered credit card purchases for other sellers for products including lottery tickets, British bonds, and consumer benefits packages.

"This case represents another step in the Commission’s crackdown on sellers of bogus credit card protection services. Rather than protecting consumers, these scams victimize them," said J. Howard Beales, III, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. "In this case, the defendants not only sold worthless credit card protection, but also laundered credit card receipts for other telemarketers through offshore companies and books."

The five corporate defendants named in the complaint are:

  1. Farpoint Services International, Ltd.
  2. Garrison Corporation, Inc.
  3. American Card Services, S.A.
  4. Consolidated Group of Companies, LLC
  5. Hyperion, LLC

Farpoint is a British corporation, incorporated in the name of defendant Roberta Galway. It allegedly contracted with telemarketers to sell the Garrison Assurance and American Card Registry credit card loss-protection packages, and arranged for credit card processing for telemarketers of products other than those that the defendants sold. The two individual defendants named in the complaint, Philip Arcand and Galway, allegedly are principles of the five corporate defendants.

Arcand created the Garrison and American Card Registry products and scripts, processed transactions for third parties, and kept property in Galway’s name. Both Arcand and Galway lived in Las Vegas for at least six months of the year while they operated the alleged scam. They currently are incarcerated in Los Angeles awaiting trial on charges of mail fraud and committing fraud against the elderly.

Garrison Corporation, Inc., incorporated in the British Virgin Islands, allegedly was set up to act as a conduit, through its account at the Bank of Bermuda, for funds processed through the defendants’ merchant account at Compass Bank. Garrison currently is inactive, and Compass Bank has frozen all of its assets. Hyperion LLC was an assumed business name that was used to obtain a merchant account at Compass.

American Card Services, S.A. (ACS) was incorporated in Managua, Nicaragua, to facilitate offshore banking in that country. The company contracted with telemarketers to sell the credit card loss-protection in the name of Garrison Assurance and American Card Registry. Like Garrison, ACS is no longer in business.

Consolidated Group of Companies is a Nevada limited liability corporation that Arcand owns. Originally incorporated with the name Polo Holdings LLC, the defendants changed its name to CGC in March 2001. The company is a shell with no assets and never was engaged in any business. Arcand used the company (Polo Holdings) to launder credit card charges for several telemarketing companies.

According to the FTC, the defendants created and deceptively marketed two credit card loss protection programs – the Garrison Assurance Credit Card Registry and the American Card Registry – in violation of the FTC Act and the Telemarketing Sales Rule.

The defendants’ telemarketers used sales scripts that allegedly employed scare tactics, telling consumers that their credit card numbers were accessible over the Internet and that unless they purchased the "protection," they would be liable for unauthorized charges when criminals used their cards to make purchases. The scripts implied that the defendants’ protection would cover all potential losses, and that consumers would not have to pay for the unauthorized charges. The cost of these "services" was between $279 and $299. In addition, the FTC alleged that the defendants used merchant accounts established in their names to process credit card transactions for unrelated companies.


Consumer News

July 9 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts

Print, mail, etc.




FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.

Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Rogues Gallery | Good Guys | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | Search | Video | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds | Radio | Job Postings




Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.