NEWS   RECALLS   COMPLAINT FORM   SCAM ALERTS   RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide   Class Actions   Lemon Laws   FAQ   Newsletters  
Bookmark and Share


Complain about a product or service

Automotive   Education   Employment   Electronics   Family   Finance   Health    Homeowners   Insurance   Pets   Shopping   Travel    Print This     Email This  



NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Minnesota Ponders Qwest's Fate





October 28, 2002
The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (PUC) is pondering what to do about Qwest, which was found by the PUC to have effectively sabotaged local telephone competition through illegal, secret deals that provided discounts and other favors to a select few competitors at the expense of others.

Qwest, the state's dominant phone company, has been seeking federal permission to enter the $10 billion long-distance market in the states where it provides local service. Last week, the U.S. Justice Department recommended that Qwest be allowed into the long-distance business in nine states, not including Minnesota, even though at least three other states have recently sued Qwest for deceptive practices.

The Minnesota PUC is considering several possible punishments for Qwest -- including breaking it up, fining it at least $50 million or even prohibiting it from doing business in Minnesota.

In testimony before the PUC, company officials said that Qwest's new CEO, Richard Notebaert, was dedicated to cleaning up the company's practices and that the state did not have to worry about Qwest once again throwing up roadblocks to some competitors while greasing the skids for others. The PUC should simply trust the company and monitor its activities, one executive testified.

Consumers, on the other hand, are calling for strong penalties.

"That sort of dishonesty, making a profit through deception, is disgusting. I'm encouraging the PUC to set an example in this case," said Erik Shetney, a Qwest customer who testified before the PUC.

PUC Chairman Gregory Scott has publicly suggested that the commission yank Qwest's certificate of authority to do business in Minnesota. That would force the company to sell its Minnesota telephone operations.

The state's Commerce Department has called for a less radical solution -- a so-called "structural separation" under which Qwest would be broken into two units, one to handle telephone service sales to the public and another that would sell network access to competing telephone companies. That would eliminate the possibility of future sweetheart deals, the department said.

An administrative law judge found that Qwest used the secret deals not only to block effective competition but also to silence those who might have spoken out again Qwest's attempt to enter the long-distance business in Minnesota.





CONSUMER NEWS

SAFETY RECALLS

Back to the top |

Advertisement


Custom Search
AUTOMOTIVE
• Dealers
• Manufacturers
• Service
• Extended Warranties
• Lemon Laws
• Recalls
• Tires
• Transporters

FAMILY
• Aging
• Children, Parenting
• Recalls
• Dating
• Education
• Entertainment
• Pets
• Weddings
FINANCE
• Annuities
• Banks
• Credit Cards
• Debt Collection
• Debt Counseling
• Insurance
• Investing
• Loans
• Mortgages
• Payday Loans
• Student Loans
• Tax Prep

HEALTH
• Doctors
• Drugs, Pharmacies
• Health Clubs
• Hearing Care
• Hospitals
• Nursing Homes
• Nutrition, Diets
• Vision Care
• Weight Loss
HOUSE & HOME
• Appliances
• Cookware
• Furniture
• Home Improvements
• Lawn & Garden
• Movers
• Pools & Spas
• Realtors, Rental Agents
• Recalls
• Utilities

ELECTRONICS
• Cable TV/DBS
• Cameras
• Cell Phones
• Computers
• Home Electronics
• Internet Access
• Local Phone Service
• Long Distance
• VoIP
SHOPPING
• Delivery Services
• In-Home
• Online
• Retail Stores
• Sporting Goods
• Supermarkets
• Telemarketers

TRAVEL
• Airlines
• Bus Lines
• Car Rental
• Cruises
• Hotels
• Travel Agents
• Trains

RESOURCES
• Class Actions
• Complaint Form
• Small Claims Guide
• Lemon Laws
CONSUMER NEWS
• Latest News
• Automotive
• Telecom
• Financial
• Health
• Homeowners
• Scams
• Seniors
• Travel
• More ...

RECALLS
• Automotive
• Children's Products
• Drugs
• Food
• Household Products
• Sporting Goods

ABOUT US
• FAQ
• Privacy Policy
• Advertise With Us
• Newsroom
• Syndication
• Terms of Use

Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2010 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.