|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
|
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
Internet Mortgage Scam Halted"30-Minute Mortgage" Sold Consumers' Personal Data Without Permission |
|||
|
December 9, 2003
The settlement requires the principals of 30 Minute Mortgage to post $1 million bonds before sending unsolicited commercial e-mail - spam - in the future. The settlements also bar further misrepresentations and prohibit the defendants from using or benefitting from personal information that was deceptively collected from consumers. In January 2003, the FTC filed a complaint in U.S. District court charging that 30 Minute Mortgage Inc. sent spam and maintained Web sites where it advertised “3.95% 30 Year Mortgages” and described itself as a “national mortgage lender.” The FTC charged that the company urged potential customers to complete detailed online loan applications that included such information as social security numbers, income, and assets. The company assured consumers that their sensitive information would be protected because it would be transmitted using Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) technology. The FTC alleged that 30 Minute Mortgage was not a “national mortgage lender” and did not offer 3.95% 30 year loans. Instead, the company allegedly sold or offered to sell thousands of completed applications to nonaffiliated third parties without consumers’ consent. The FTC also alleged that consumers’ sensitive personal and financial information was not protected in transmission because the Web sites at times did not use SSL or other encryption technology. The FTC charged 30 Minute Mortgage, its president Gregory P. Roth, and its former national sales director Peter W. Stolz, with violating the FTC Act, the Truth in Lending Act, and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. The judgments require 30 Minute Mortgage, Roth, and Stolz to post $1 million bonds before sending unsolicited commercial e-mail or “spam.” The judgments also bar the defendants from:
Based on financial disclosures provided to the FTC, a $57,500 judgment against Roth has been suspended. Should the Court find any material misstatement or omission in these financial disclosures, the full amount of the judgment will be due. |
|||
Back to the top | |
||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING Delivery Services In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2010 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|