|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
Envelope-Stuffing Promoters Seal Plea Deal |
|||
|
August 4, 2003
In June 2002, the FTC filed a complaint against the defendants alleging that they operated a deceptive work-at-home scheme selling consumers a work-at-home envelope stuffing opportunity for a registration fee ranging from $33 to $43. According to the complaint, the defendants claimed that consumers could make a substantial amount of money from the envelope stuffing opportunity, and they offered an unconditional money back guarantee of the registration fee if consumers were not satisfied. The companies operated under both names, America’s Shopping Network and Consumer Services, and advertised their work-at-home opportunities through newspaper ads and direct mail. The pitch varied slightly; the ASN pitch was the old fashioned envelope stuffing scheme which falsely promised to pay consumers 50 cents to $1 for every envelope stuffed, and the CS version falsely promised to pay consumers $635 a week for processing mail, according to the FTC. In fact, the FTC alleged that these schemes turned out to be chain marketing schemes, where consumers could only earn money through commissions for recruiting other consumers to pay defendants in response to the same pitch. The FTC’s complaint alleged that, in the advertising and promotional materials, the defendants misrepresented that:
Under the terms of the proposed settlement announced today, the defendants are permanently banned from selling any work-at-home opportunities that are chain marketing schemes, and are prohibited from making misrepresentations in connection with the sale of any business venture, work-at-home employment opportunity, or any other good or service, including misrepresenting earnings, the types of employment opportunities promised, or the refund policy offered. The defendants are required to pay $30,000 for consumer redress. The settlement includes an "avalanche" clause making all of the defendants liable for $18 million if it is found that they made any material misrepresentations or omissions on their financial statements. The settlement further prohibits the defendants from selling their customer lists. |
|||
Back to the top | News |
||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|