|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
Automakers Vow To Improve Safety |
|||
|
December 03, 2003
Participating manufacturers are BMW, DaimlerChrysler, Ford Motor Co., General Motors, Honda, Hyundai, Isuzu, Kia, Mazda, Mitsubishi, Nissan, Subaru, Suzuki, Toyota and Volkswagen. The voluntary safety plan represents “industrywide cooperation that we could only dream about a few years ago,” said Robert Strassburger, vice president for safety of the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, which represents nine of the companies Critics weren't impressed. "While we are pleased that the automakers are finally confronting the dangers of SUVs, the voluntary program is a diversionary tactic to stave off meaningful federal regulation and standards that consumers can rely on," said Joan Claybrook, president of Public Citizen and former administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). “Any progress is progress,” said the current NHTSA Administrator, Dr. Jeffrey Runge, who has been highly critical of SUV's safety shortcomings. Runge has warned that he would seek tougher regulations if the industry did not act to reduce the threat posed by bigger vehicles to occupants of smaller vehicles, known as the compatibility issue. The voluntary standards are actually performance criteria. That means a manufacturer can use any meansa it wants to limit the risk of injuries in side-impact crashes and head-on collisions. Most manufacturers are expected to use head-protecting, side-impact airbags as well as changes to the front ends and frames of light trucks to lower the points at which they would hit other vehicles in frontal impacts. Claybrook said the performance criteria should be federally mandated. Auto manufacturers "want to write protocols on their own terms, behind closed doors," she said. "Not only would the protocols be unenforceable, any company could abandon them at any time it chose without telling the public. For the public, this simply is not good enough." |
|||
Back to the top | News |
||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|