|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
Bogus California High School to Pay $500,000 |
||||||||||||||
|
March 18, 2005
Lockyer today filed the proposed settlement of the consumer protection lawsuit with Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Brian F. Gasdia, who must approve it before it becomes final. The settlement calls for the defendants to pay $400,000 in restitution to victims. The defendants must work with Lockyer's office to identify consumers eligible for restitution. Additionally, the defendants must pay $50,000 in civil penalties and $40,000 to reimburse Lockyer's office for its costs. Another $10,000 will reimburse the Los Angeles County Department of Consumer Affairs (LADCA), which investigated the case jointly with Lockyer's office. The settlement also includes "injunctive relief" provisions that prohibit the defendants from committing the fraudulent practices alleged in the lawsuit. Aside from CAHS, the defendants who are parties to the settlement include: Daniel A.D. Gossai, "principal" and founder of CAHS; and Janet H. Gossai, wife of Daniel Gossai, who helped hide the couple's CAHS-related assets. Lockyer filed the lawsuit on August 2, 2004, and quickly obtained a court order that effectively shut down CAHS and froze the defendants' CAHS-related assets. Three days later, agents from Lockyer's office seized evidence from CAHS facilities and the Gossais' home, including $550,000 in U.S. and foreign currency and cashier's checks made out to the Gossais. CAHS operated mainly out of Paramount and Huntington Park, and conducted classes at about 26 locations in California. The defendants targeted Latino immigrants and told consumers CAHS diplomas would help them win admission to college, obtain financial aid and get higher-paying jobs, according to the complaint. The defendants charged consumers about $500 for a 10-week, 30-hour course, and told victims they would earn a high school diploma, Lockyer's complaint alleged. In reality, the CAHS diplomas – handed out at "commencement ceremonies" – were useless for any purpose, the complaint alleged. The school was not recognized either by the federal or state government. Additionally, CAHS' program did not help students meet the requirements of accredited colleges, including California State University and the University of California, according to the complaint. The LADCA brought the case to the attention of Lockyer's office after receiving numerous complaints from CAHS "diploma" recipients who were rejected for admission to vocational programs or fired from their jobs for not having a high school diploma. The defendants' business practices violated state laws prohibiting unfair competition, and false or deceptive advertising, the complaint alleged. Declarations filed with the court evidenced the woefully inadequate education received by CAHS students. According to the declarations: CAHS did not use textbooks, but instead gave consumers a 54-page workbook; the workbook contained numerous factual errors, including a statement that the U.S. government has four branches (executive, legislative, judicial and administrative); and in classes, students were taught the United States has 53 states, that the flag has not been updated to reflect the additional three states, and that Congress has one house for Democrats and a second for Republicans. The injunctive relief provisions of the settlement permanently prohibit the defendants from representing: they operate a high school; they offer educational services that will lead to a high school diploma; they offer educational services that will "substantially" prepare students for high school, college or the GED exam, or help consumers obtain financial aid; and that any educational services they offer are recognized or approved by any governmental agency. Lockyer today also filed with Judge Gasdia a separate, smaller settlement with Noel Brito, director of West Side Education Corporation (West Side), which operated CAHS sites throughout Southern California. The settlement requires Brito to pay a $2,500 civil penalty. Additionally, Lockyer on February 17, 2005 obtained court approval of a third settlement with West Side and its president David L. Soto. That settlement requires the defendants to pay $31,000 for consumer restitution, a $5,000 civil penalty, $5,000 in cost reimbursement to Lockyer's office and $9,000 in cost reimbursement to the LADCA. Lockyer's office continues to try and reach a settlement with the one remaining defendant, Fabricio Sandoval, a teacher and director of admissions at CAHS. Lockyer previously dropped from the lawsuit an eighth defendant, CAHS teacher Janira Jacobs. Report Your Experience
|
||||||||||||||
Back to the top | |
|||||||||||||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|