Complain about a product or service

Judges OKs Cell Phone Safety Case

June 14, 2005
A federal judge in Maryland has ruled that a class action complaint challenging the cell phone industry's failure to disclose safety issues relating to certain phones sold to consumers in Washington, D.C., and Maryland should be returned to D.C. Superior Court for trial.

• Cancer Center Workers Warned about Cell Phone Risks • New Mexico Allergy Sufferers Want Public Wi-Fi Ban • Study Cautions Pregnant Women On Cell Phone Use • Researcher: Cell Phones 'More Dangerous Than Smoking' • Cell Phones May Provide False Sense Of Security • Study Suggests Cell Phone-Salivary Gland Cancer Link • Scientist Worries WiFi May Harm Children • British Study To Examine Cell Phone-Health Links • Study: Cell Phone Use Not Linked to Cancer Risk • FDA Will Review Cell Phone-Cancer Link • Supreme Court Clears Cell Phone Cancer Suits for Trial • St. Louis Researchers Find Cell Phone Radiation Doesn't Promote Cancer • Swedish Study Finds No Cell Phone-Cancer Link in First Decade of Use • WHO Study Examines Cellphone Risks to Kids • Judges OKs Cell Phone Safety Case • Cell Phones May Harm Sperm Cells, British Study Finds • Swedish Study Finds Cell Phone-Brain Tumor Link • Firefly Promotes Cell Phone for Kids • Researchers: Cell Phones Pose Cancer Risk for Kids • British Lab Will Study Cell Phone Radiation • Swedish Study Finds Higher Risk in Long-Term Users • Cell Phones Probably Safe: British Study • Court Blocks Cell Phone "Ray Blockers" • Cell Phone Radiation Suit Dismissed • Baltimore attorney Peter Angelos enters cell suit • New Orleans judge lets cell-phone suit stand • Report Finds "Legitimate Questions" About Cell Phone Safety • Doctor Blames Cell Phones for His Brain Tumor • Cell Phone Cancer Link • Readers Report Their Problems • Cell Phone Safety: An Editorial

Judge Catherine C. Blake granted the plaintiff's motion for remand, thereby authorizing the case to proceed in state court.

The complaint, which was originally filed in September, 2002, charges cell phone manufacturers Audiovox, Motorola, Nokia, Ericsson, Qualcomm, Kyocera and Samsung with selling cell phones to consumers without disclosing pertinent safety information.

The allegations in the complaint concentrate on defendants' "decision whether or not to communicate to the consumer information regarding the important safety debate raging within the industry, (many details of which are known only to industry insiders)."

The complaint also challenges defendants' failure to disclose the true meaning of their "Specific Absorption Rate" levels for their cell phones. The complaint alleges that such misrepresentations and omissions violate state consumer fraud laws and that the proper disclosures "would allow consumers to decide for themselves" whether the safety debate warrants a consumer's modification of their cell phone usage and/or model choice.

The complaint is brought on behalf of a class of all persons who purchased a wireless handheld telephone in Maryland or the District of Columbia, between January 1, 1989 and the present, that was manufactured by one of the defendants. The complaint seeks monetary restitution and injunctive relief to prevent further misrepresentations and omissions by defendants.

Counsel for the plaintiffs is the D.C. law firm of Finkelstein, Thompson & Loughran.

Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.

Back to the top |