Complain about a product or service

California to Try Again With Telecommunications Bill of Rights

December 29, 2005

• How to Avoid Early Termination Fees • Site Offers Cell Phone Contract Swapping --- News • Verizon Wireless To Increase Termination Fees to $350 • Verizon Wireless Revamps "Exclusive" Handset Deals • Sprint Text Messaging Tax Suit Dropped • Senate Committee Investigates Cell Phone Contracts • Senate Committee To Investigate Cell Phone Contracts • Judge Rules Sprint Termination Fees are Illegal • Verizon Pays $21 Million to Settle Termination Fee Lawsuit • Washington Power Grab May Be Price of Lower Cell Phone Termination Fees • U.S. Cellular Settles 'Free' Phone Complaint • Cell Phone Industry Losing Its Treasured Arbitration Clauses • Wireless Firms Face Pressure On Termination Fees • Verizon, FCC Cook Up Termination-Fee Plan • FCC Not Ready to Pry Open Wireless Networks • Sprint Removes Three Fees, Adds Two New Ones • Sprint, T-Mobile Prorate Termination Fees • AT&T Changes Contract Policy • California Supreme Court OKs T-Mobile Class Action • Verizon Wireless Changes Contract Policy • FCC, Congress May Limit Cable, Cell Phone Termination Fees • Cell Phone Consumers Win Court Victory • Text Messaging Charges Surprise Cell Phone Users • Cell Phone Customers Held Captive by Termination Fees • Poll Finds Cell Phone Users Want Stronger Consumer Protection • Michigan Challenges One-Sided Cell Phone Contracts • New York Considers Tough Cell Phone Consumer Protection Law • California to Try Again With Telecommunications Bill of Rights • California Suspends Wireless Bill of Rights • California Adopts Wireless Consumer Bill of Rights

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) will vote in January on a proposal to create a "Telecommunications Consumer Fraud Unit," part of the latest version of the state's controversial Consumer Bill of Rights.

Also in the new Bill of Rights is a proposal for a consumer-education campaign as well as a proposal to extend the CPUC's toll-free consumer hotline.

"With traditional regulation it takes years to bring a case against a company that is ripping off consumers -- that won't work in today's fast-paced telecom world," said CPUC Commissioner Susan Kennedy. "This proposal gives the CPUC the tools to protect consumers against fraud in real-time, and provides consumers with the tools they need to protect themselves."

Kennedy, regarded as a pro-business Democrat, drafted the measure with CPUC President Michael Peevey but she won't be around for the January vote. She's leaving the CPUC to become chief of staff to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, a Republican who opposes additional wireless regulations.

Peevey and Kennedy both voted to suspend the original Telecommunications Consumer Bill of Rights in January 2005 after cell phone companies spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on lobbying efforts.

The latest version isn't being very well received either. Verizon Wireless was the first to issue a broadside against it.

"Verizon Wireless believes that state regulation aimed at the highly competitive, high-tech wireless industry, such as the new burdensome rules, is unnecessary and inappropriate," said Michael Bagley, Verizon Wireless West area executive vice president of public policy.

"California already boasts the toughest consumer-protection laws in the nation, and those laws apply to all competitive industries, including the wireless industry. Adding an extra layer of regulation at the CPUC will hurt and cost consumers," Bagley said.

The new rule's prospects are murky. Passage will require a majority of the five-member CPUC. With Kennedy gone, and possibly not replaced by the time the vote takes place, a majority may be hard to come by.

The new guidelines cover wireless and wireline carrier disclosure, marketing, service initiation and changes, billing and other business practices. The guidelines were crafted through compromise by CPUC Commissioner Geoffrey Brown (D) and were supported by consumer proponents, disability rights advocates and others.

Besides throwing money around in Sacramento, the wireless industry is heavily lobbying Congress and the Federal Communications Commission to further pre-empt state regulation of wireless phone operators. The wireless industry would like to see Congress do away with any remaining state rules affecting wireless and broadband services.

Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.

Share		Follow us on Twitter.

Back to the top |