CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Ford Faces Mountain of Explorer Suits



February 5, 2005
Ford lawyers will be busy this year defending more than two dozen civil suits attacking the safety of the popular Explorer sport utility vehicle.

Rollovers

Feds Delay New Roof-Crush Rule til October
Report: NHTSA Seeks More Time for Roof-Crush Rule
Senators Seek Delay in New Roof Strength Safety Rules
Senators Question Roof Strength Safety Rules
Nader Protests Feds' Roof Crush Plan
Treacherous Treads Still Taking Lives
Ford Class Action Settlement Leaves Consumers in the Dust
Feds' Roof Crush Rule Inadequate, Critics Charge
New Study: Stronger SUV Roofs Save Lives
Ford Loses $82 Million Rollover Verdict Appeal
Feds Delay Roof Strength Rule Again
Ford Settles Explorer Rollover Lawsuits
Safety Crusaders Seek Action on Roof Crush Injuries
Roof Crush Summit Highlights Safety Shortcomings
Feds Ignore Roof Crush Conference
Feds Delay New Roof Strength Rule
GM to Offer Rollover Airbags, Ford to Strengthen Roofs
Safety Groups Want Earlier Stability Control Rule
---
More about Rollovers ...

Plaintiffs in those cases, and hundreds more, are using internal Ford documents released after the Firestone tire crisis in 2000 to back claims that the Explorer is defective and that Ford balked at making crucial changes.

Attorneys suing Ford have developed a network for sharing the documents among hundreds of court cases.

The documents include a recommendation in 1993 by Ford engineers that the Explorer's roof supports be strengthened to prevent the roof from collapsing in a rollover crash.

Ford did not make the changes because the roof support met government standards.

There is also a 1999 warning by Ford engineers in Venezuela that rollover crashes in Explorers related to suspension flaws, caused nine deaths. In 1996, Ford engineers wrote that the issue could be taken care of by moving the shock absorbers closer to the wheels.

The change was not made.

Ford cites government data that shows the death rate in rollover crashes is lower for the Explorer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee and Chevrolet Blazer.

Ford lost two Explorer lawsuits last year -- one in San Diego with a $369 million judgment that was later reduced to $150 million, and one in Fort Myers, Fla., with a judgment of $5.3 million. Ford settled the Florida case for an undisclosed amount.

In its financial reports, Ford does not estimate how much all these lawsuits would specifically cost the company.

In 2001, in one of the biggest recalls in U.S. history, former Ford CEO Jacques Nasser announced that the automaker was spending $3 billion to replace all 13 million Firestone tires on Explorers at the time.

More than 270 highway deaths were reported from accidents resulting from the separation of the vehicle's tire treads.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

September 7 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts



FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.



Back to the top |


Home | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds |


Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.