CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Jury Awards $43 Million in Flaming Lincoln Case




Advertisement




Cheap Car Insurance
Insurance companies on TV can’t compete with our multi-quote system.
Click here for your quote!

April 20, 2005
An Illinois jury has awarded $43 million to the severely-injured widow of a man killed in a fiery crash two years ago for which the plaintiff's attorneys say Ford Motor Co. was primarily to blame.


Crown Vic Disappears from Ford Dealer Lots
Ford Recalls Police Cruiser for Faulty Wheels
New York Taxi Fire Puts Heat on Ford
Ford Offers Retrofit to Prevent Fire in Lincoln Limos
Jury Awards $43 Million in Flaming Lincoln Case
Jury Finds Ford Not Liable in Crown Vic Fire
Ford Recalls Police Cars, Taxis to Fix Different Fire Problem
Chrysler Rolls Out New Dodge Charger Police Car
Arkansas Refuses to Back Down
Illinois Cops Drop Out of Crown Vic Class Action
Dallas to Add Fire Suppressant to Fords
Philadelphia Joins Ford Suits
Police Car Flunks Ford's Own Test, Dallas DA Charges
Ford Will Shield Police Fuel Tanks
Cleveland Files Flaming Ford Suit
Ford Agrees to Police Car Safety Probe
New Jersey City Sues Ford

Dora Jablonski's husband, John Jablonski, was killed after a car driven by Natalie Ingram, then a 21-year-old college student, slammed into the rear of Jablonski's Lincoln Town Car, which had stopped for construction on Interstate 270, near the Illinois 203 exit, in downstate Illinois.

Jablonski's attorney, Brad Lakin, argued that Ford ignored warnings from its own engineers that designing the 1993 Lincoln Town Car with a vertical fuel tank behind the rear axle was unsafe. Later, the company chose not to spend $9.95 per car to relocate the fuel tank to a safer location.

In his closing statement, Lakin asked the jury to award Jablonski and her family $32 million for medical expenses, pain and suffering, and other expenses but left it up to them to decide on punitive damages. The jury decided on $15 million in punitive damages after deliberating for less than six hours.

Dora Jablonski testified for nearly 90 minutes from her wheelchair. Jurors learned that she was burned over 32 percent of her body and came away with deformities to her ears, nose, head, face, hands, arms, shoulders, and legs.

Lakin said that Ford had known about the potential of safety problems with its design for 40 years but that "no Ford employees were ready to accept responsibility."

Ford's attorney, Jim Feeney, said the Town Car met the highest crash standards in the industry. Accidents and fires occur in all cars, he argued, and the risk of fire in such a crash is extremely rare.

Feeney argued that the company followed federal safety guidelines by acting reasonably and by offering a car that met the criteria of being reasonably safe.

Though not identical, the Town Car is similar to the Ford Crown Victoria police cars which have been the target of lawsuits throughout the nation. Police contend the cars tend to explode into flames when hit from behind.

Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

September 7 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts



FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.



Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds |


Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.