Complain about a product or service

Ford Fights Rollover Document Disclosure

May 10, 2005
The Ford Motor Co. is waging a fierce battle in Florida and Washington to keep documents that suggest roof strength is key to protecting people in rollover crashes secret.

Rollovers • Cars that Pass National Rollover Standard May Still be Deadly • Feds Delay New Roof-Crush Rule til October • Report: NHTSA Seeks More Time for Roof-Crush Rule • Senators Seek Delay in New Roof Strength Safety Rules • Senators Question Roof Strength Safety Rules • Nader Protests Feds' Roof Crush Plan • Treacherous Treads Still Taking Lives • Ford Class Action Settlement Leaves Consumers in the Dust • Feds' Roof Crush Rule Inadequate, Critics Charge • New Study: Stronger SUV Roofs Save Lives • Ford Loses $82 Million Rollover Verdict Appeal • Feds Delay Roof Strength Rule Again • Ford Settles Explorer Rollover Lawsuits • Safety Crusaders Seek Action on Roof Crush Injuries • Roof Crush Summit Highlights Safety Shortcomings • Feds Ignore Roof Crush Conference • Feds Delay New Roof Strength Rule • GM to Offer Rollover Airbags, Ford to Strengthen Roofs • Safety Groups Want Earlier Stability Control Rule --- • More about Rollovers ...

On the Washington front, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has sent a proposed update to the roof crush standard to the White House for review. Consumer activists are campaigning for stronger roof requirements and the results are likely to be final later this year.

In Florida, Ford has asked a court in to issue an order preventing the public from viewing crash reports from its Volvo subsidiary that showed engineers working to improve the roof structure and seat belts in the XC90 to make the SUV safer.

The documents were used in a Florida court by lawyers for Claire Duncan, killed in a rollover crash involving a Ford Explorer. Ford, which lost the case, said the Explorer's roof exceeded federal standards, and federal crash data show that the SUV is as safe as comparable vehicles.

Other documents used as evidence in the trial showed Ford engineers made the Explorer roof weaker during two vehicle redesigns in the 1990s.

Ford is appealing the $10.2 million jury verdict in the Duncan case.

The same documents used as evidence in the trial were placed in the public docket of the NHTSA on April 26. They were temporarily removed last week after Ford protested. Ford says the papers contain corporate trade secrets.

In an April 29 letter to NHTSA, Ford assistant general counsel Donald Lough wrote that widespread public access to the documents "would likely result in substantial competitive harm" by revealing how the company introduces new technologies.

Safety advocates argue that the Volvo engineering reports were especially damning, considering the longtime contention by Ford that roof strength is not an important factor in rollover crashes.

Automakers have argued for decades that occupants are killed or injured in rollover crashes because they fly out of their seats and "dive" into the roof as the vehicle turns over.

The Volvo test reports show that engineers in Sweden placed a high priority on roof strength, as well as improved safety belts, as Volvo developed its first SUV, the XC90.

In one test report, dated August 1999, a crash-test dummy received severe head blows as an Explorer roof caved in. A NHTSA spokesman said the agency took the documents down temporarily, and it is waiting for a full legal argument from Ford about why they should not be available to the public.

Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.

Share		Follow us on Twitter.

Back to the top |