CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Australian HGH Spammers Ordered to Pay $2.2 Million





September 21, 2005
A U.S. district court judge has ordered a permanent halt to an operation that used illegal spam to make bogus claims for human growth hormone products that contained no human growth hormone and diet patches that did not provide the miraculous results they claimed.

Human Growth Hormone
Feds Squash Hoodia, Human Growth Hormone Scams
Australian HGH Spammers Ordered to Pay $2.2 Million
Florida Human Growth Hormone Promoter Settles FTC Case
Court Slams Human Growth Hormone Spammer
Virginia Arrests Alleged HGH Spammer
Feds Nab Two Big Spammers

Judge Marvin E. Aspen ruled that the operators were violating federal laws and ordered them to pay a total of $2.2 million -- the entire amount of their ill-gotten gains.

In April 2004, the FTC filed legal charges against Global Web Promotions Pty Ltd., an Australian company that the FTC alleges is responsible for massive amounts of spam in the United States. Global Web claimed its human growth hormone products “HGH” and “Natural HGH” could “maintain [a user’s] appearance and current biological age for the next 10 to 20 years.”

Experts cited by the FTC disputed the claims, and the FTC alleged the claims were false. The products do not contain growth hormone of any sort, according to papers filed with the court.

The operation also promoted a diet patch it sold, claiming it could result in weight loss of as much as six pounds per week. The FTC alleged the claims were unsubstantiated. The diet patch was sold for $80.90 and the HGH products cost $74.95.

In addition to making the deceptive and unsubstantiated claims, which the FTC alleged violate the FTC Act, the FTC also alleged that Global Web and its principals forged headers on e-mail to make it appear that they came from an innocent third parties – a practice known as spoofing.

Undeliverable e-mail is returned to the innocent victims, often flooding their servers and interfering with normal operations. Spoofing violates the CAN-SPAM Act.

At the request of the FTC, the judge ordered a temporary halt to the claims and issued orders to the U.S. companies filling the orders for the patches and HGH products to stop filling Global Web’s orders in the United States. The court also temporarily froze assets located in the United States.

The FTC charged Global Web Promotions Pty Ltd., Michael John Anthony Van Essen, and Lance Thomas Atkinson with violations of the FTC Act and the CAN-SPAM Act.

In addition to barring the false claims in its final judgment, the court concluded that the defendants made $490,280 selling the bogus diet patches and HGH products, and earned $1,709,982.74 sending illegal spam for affiliates that also made deceptive claims for dietary supplements. The court ordered the defendants to give up $2,200,262 -- the total of their ill-gotten gains.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

September 7 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts



FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.







Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds |


Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.