CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Lasik Vision Center Settles False Advertising Charges





November 29, 2005


FDA Panel Urges Clearer LASIK Warnings
FDA Approves New LASIK Device
Lasik Vision Center Settles False Advertising Charges
Banker Gets $7 Million in LASIK Suit
LASIK Ads Misleading, FTC Charges
Louisiana Eye Surgeon Fined $1 Million
---
More ...

Following an advertising campaign throughout Illinois that allegedly misrepresented the actual cost of corrective laser eye surgery, a Florida company that performs the surgeries has agreed to ensure that future ads reflect the actual cost of its procedures.

Attorney General Lisa Madigan�s office filed a lawsuit charging Lasik Vision Institute with violations of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act and the Illinois Administrative Rules on Retail Advertising.

�Patients considering a surgical procedure should never be swayed by deceptive advertisements or false promises,� Madigan said. �This settlement will provide that Lasik�s future advertisements reflect the actual cost of procedures.�

Madigan�s lawsuit contended that between June 2003 and June 2004, Lasik Vision Institute advertised surgeries for �as low as $299� in newspapers statewide. After June 2004, advertisements promoted �Lasik $499 per eye.�

Madigan�s lawsuit says the ads did not adequately disclose the limitations on the advertised price, nor did they disclose the range of prices of surgeries offered and the conditions for each. As a result, may consumers ended up paying more than the advertised price.

The lawsuit also claimed that prospective patients were required to pay a $100 non-refundable deposit before learning if the lower-cost procedure was appropriate for their vision needs.

The Nidek laser procedure is a lower-cost option for corrective laser eye surgery; however, patients with certain prescriptions as well as pre-existing medical conditions, such as cataracts, diabetes and glaucoma, may not be eligible to undergo the surgery.

Finally, Madigan�s lawsuit alleged Lasik Vision Institute advertised that screening exams would be conducted by a doctor of ophthalmology when, in fact, the exams were conducted by doctors of optometry.

In signing the settlement agreement, Lasik agreed that all future ads will be in full compliance with Illinois law.

In addition, the company has agreed to pay a voluntary contribution of $17,500 to the Attorney General Court Ordered and Voluntary Compliance Payment Project Fund for Consumer Enforcement and Education.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

July 20 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts

Print, mail, etc.






FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.



Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Rogues Gallery | Good Guys | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | Search | Video | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds | Radio | Job Postings




Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.