|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
Lasik Vision Center Settles False Advertising Charges |
|||||||||||||
|
November 29, 2005
Attorney General Lisa Madigan�s office filed a lawsuit charging Lasik Vision Institute with violations of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act and the Illinois Administrative Rules on Retail Advertising. �Patients considering a surgical procedure should never be swayed by deceptive advertisements or false promises,� Madigan said. �This settlement will provide that Lasik�s future advertisements reflect the actual cost of procedures.� Madigan�s lawsuit contended that between June 2003 and June 2004, Lasik Vision Institute advertised surgeries for �as low as $299� in newspapers statewide. After June 2004, advertisements promoted �Lasik $499 per eye.� Madigan�s lawsuit says the ads did not adequately disclose the limitations on the advertised price, nor did they disclose the range of prices of surgeries offered and the conditions for each. As a result, may consumers ended up paying more than the advertised price. The lawsuit also claimed that prospective patients were required to pay a $100 non-refundable deposit before learning if the lower-cost procedure was appropriate for their vision needs. The Nidek laser procedure is a lower-cost option for corrective laser eye surgery; however, patients with certain prescriptions as well as pre-existing medical conditions, such as cataracts, diabetes and glaucoma, may not be eligible to undergo the surgery. Finally, Madigan�s lawsuit alleged Lasik Vision Institute advertised that screening exams would be conducted by a doctor of ophthalmology when, in fact, the exams were conducted by doctors of optometry. In signing the settlement agreement, Lasik agreed that all future ads will be in full compliance with Illinois law. In addition, the company has agreed to pay a voluntary contribution of $17,500 to the Attorney General Court Ordered and Voluntary Compliance Payment Project Fund for Consumer Enforcement and Education. Report Your Experience
|
|||||||||||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|