|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
![]() |
Suit Charges Martha Stewart Knew of Defective Glass in Patio Tabletops |
|||||||||||||
|
August 10, 2005
The suit alleges that substandard parts were used in the construction of the tables as well as "materials that are inappropriate for the use for which they are intended" and that the tables have "inherent design and manufacturing defects" that caused the glass tops to shattered unexpectedly during ordinary use. Consumers have been filing similar complaints with ConsumerAffairs.com since 2002. The tables were sold exclusively by KMart. "I purchased a complete Martha Stewart Patio set in May of 2003. I housed it indoors in the winter months, and took very good care of it," Bridgette of Lewes, Delaware, said. "Just the other day, for no apparent reason, my glass top table shattered into a million pieces! I thought something fell out of the sky and hit it, but it did not. I am so disappointed!" In the suit, Ronat said that she also purchased her table for more than $300 in May of 2003 and used it for about two years on her home's deck. On July 7, 2005, Ronat was sitting in her living room with her two young children when she heard a loud crash from her deck. She looked out and saw that "glass from the Martha Stewart patio table had shattered into thousands of small pieces," the suit charged. "Smaller pieces of glass were quickly shattering into even smaller pieces, making the shattering glass pop like popcorn," the suit alleged. Ronat contacted KMart and was told that the glass was not covered under the 90-day warranty. The manufacturer, JRA Furniture Industries, offered her a replacement but Ronat "was not interested in receiving another glass top patio table that was apt to shatter" and asked for a refund. JRA refused. The suit charges that Martha Stewart Living and KMart knew that the tables had the tendency to shatter during ordinary use and that the company had received complaints from consumers who had purchased the defective tables and that it committed fraud by continuing to sell the tables. The suit seeks actual and punitive damages on behalf of all consumers who purchased the tables. Attorney Richard Doherty of Horwitz, Horwitz & Associates is representing the plaintiffs. Report Your Experience
|
|||||||||||||
Back to the top | |
||||||||||||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|