CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

NHTSA Nixes New Crash Tests




Advertisement




Cheap Car Insurance
Insurance companies on TV can’t compete with our multi-quote system.
Click here for your quote!

December 20, 2005

NHTSA Crash Tests

Hood Latch Failures Smash Dodge Truck Windshields
Small Pickups Mostly Dismal In Side Crash Tests
Study: Crash Tests Predict Fatalities In Cars, Not Trucks
NHTSA Gives Five Stars to 24 Passenger Vehicles
NHTSA Gives 2006 SUVs High Marks
SUVs Fare Better in New Government Crash Tests
NHTSA Nixes New Crash Tests
NHTSA Plans to Crash Test 77 Models Next Year
GM Trucks Fare Poorly in Crash Tests
Study Confirms 15-Passenger Van Rollover Risk
Suzuki Verona Rates Lowest in Government Crash Test
Side Airbags Help Mitsubishi, Toyota, Volvo Sedans Top Crash Test Ratings
NHTSA Tests Understate Rollover, Side Impact Risks, GAO Finds
Tests Find Vehicles Becoming More Stable
Tire Pressure Monitors Required on 2006 Models
---
IIHS Crash Tests
Auto Safety News

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) will keep the system it now uses to help consumers evaluate the safety of new automobiles in head-on collisions, despite repeated criticism that the present test is inadequate, outdated, misleading and in need of upgrading.

New vehicles will continue to be subjected to a 35 mile-per-hour test for frontal crashes. NHTSA will also maintain the full-frontal barrier test procedure, the current crash test dummies and rating system.

NHTSA conducts front and side impact tests on vehicles and rates them on a scale of one to five stars with five stars representing the top score. The tests are supposed to help consumers judge how a vehicle handles a crash or its likelihood of rolling over. Critics of the test point out that too many vehicles receive four or five stars, reducing the comparative value of the tests.

A report in April by the Government Accountability Office says the crash test program needs upgrades due to the growth in popularity of sport utility vehicles and light trucks. The report underscored that too many vehicles receive four and five stars.

The GAO report also questioned whether the system gives automakers enough incentives to improve vehicle safety.

NHTSA considered increasing the testing speed to 40 mph and including dummies that are more representative of women and children likely to be riding in a car or SUV. The plan also included an additional test that focused the impact on one side of the vehicle's front end. That test would have simulated the many t-bone accidents that occur at intersections through the country.

The present testing program began in 1978. NHTSA officials insist that more research is needed to "until we have established the sound science necessary to provide a basis for revising the program."



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

September 6 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts



FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.





Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds |


Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.