CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  
Small Claims Guide   Class Actions   Lemon Laws   FAQ   Newsletters   Spanish


Complain about a product or service

Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Ford Trucks Spit Spark Plugs

Ignored by Ford, Truck Owners Face Massive Repair Bills




Advertisement




Cheap Car Insurance
Insurance companies on TV can’t compete with our multi-quote system.
Click here for your quote!

By Joe Benton
ConsumerAffairs.com

January 23, 2006


Spit Spark Plugs Still Hobble Ford Trucks
Buy American? Not Again
Ford's Spit-Out Spark Plugs Hit Mechanics in their Wallets
Spit Spark Plug Ignites Ford Truck
Ford Mechanic: Engines "Dropping Like Flies"
2003 Ford Trucks Now Spitting Spark Plugs
Ford Trucks Spit Spark Plugs
Petition Asks Feds to Order Ford Recall
Consumers Complain of Spark Plug Blow-Out
---
More about Ford ...

As Ford unveils its turnaround plan, it might want to turn around and examine a problem it's left in the dust: Ford F-series trucks built between 1999 and 2004 have a nasty habit -- they spit. Spark plugs, that is.

For years, consumers have complained about their trucks blowing spark plugs out of the aluminum cylinder head, leaving a hole in the head and rendering the $30,000 vehicle useless, often on the side of the road, until repaired.

Ford has never conceded that there's a problem.

Ford, facing a deepening financial crisis, is announcing a "comprehensive restructuring plan" today, a plan that will include plant closings and layoffs, as well as a "new look" for its minivans. Likely absent from this grand strategy is any plan to stand behind its products.

As they have been doing for years, Ford owners are snorting, spitting and suing. So far this month, more than a dozen have reported the F-series blown-spark-plug problem to ConsumerAffairs.com, adding their names to a list of hundreds who've reported similar incidents with Ford F-series trucks or SUVs.

Ashlee of Arizona was driving her 2001 Ford Expedition when a spark plug blew out.

"I thought I was the only one with this problem and then the second mechanic I took my vehicle to showed me all the complaints about this happening to other people that have the same motor in their vehicles," she wrote.

"Unbelievable" is Ashlee’s description of her experience with a Ford truck product.

A Reputation Wrecked

The mighty F-series once enjoyed a reputation as solid work trucks that were dependable and capable of almost any task.

Ford truck owners, however, continue to tell ConsumerAffairs.com that the V-10 and 5.4 liter Triton V-8 are so poorly designed that the spark plug in the number three cylinder of both engines can -- and often does -- blow right out of its socket.

Some Ford truck owners have experienced the problem more than once. Some have replaced the expensive all-aluminum cylinder head only to have the plug blow out again down the road. Others have had the same problem in more than one vehicle.

"I have a 1999 F-150 and just blew a second spark plug on December 31, 2005 while traveling to Nevada," Paul wrote. "I was shocked to learn that my truck will cost $2,800 per head."

Ford refuses to stand behind the product, even when the owner has purchased the expensive extended warranty. Ford insists the problem is with the spark plug and says that spark plugs are not covered by the extended warranty.

Todd heard that explanation from his Ford dealer in Ohio.

"The local Ford dealer told me that there is no problem with the design and my extended warranty does not cover spark plugs so it would cost me $3,850 to put a new head in," Todd wrote. "What I do not understand is the fact that the spark plug did not break, it blew out of my engine! How is that not covered?"

Groovy? Not Quite

Mechanics who have worked on Ford engines damaged by blown spark plugs say there are too few threads machined into the number three cylinder spark plug hole inside the aluminum cylinder head.

The mechanics report that there are sometimes as few as three revolutions of grooves and that is probably not enough to hold the plugs when they are under stress.

"I have a 2000 Ford F-150 5.4 Triton with approx 85,000 miles on it," John wrote us from California. "It has launched a spark plug from the right rear cylinder and there are no threads left."

Ford dealerships are charging between $2,000 and $5,000 to repair the damage caused by the blown spark plug, according to consumer information and complaints.

Despite a petition detailing the issue, federal regulators at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration have declined to address the problem.

Other than to deny the warranty claims, Ford has no comment on the issue either.

A federally mandated recall would have devastating financial implications for Ford because 17 million SUVs, pickups, Crown Victorias and Mustangs are potentially involved.

Recalling the vehicles to fix the cylinder heads would generate the largest, most labor intensive and perhaps most expensive recall in automotive history.

Blowing Away Customers

On the other hand, American automakers are steadily losing market share to Asian brands, at least partly because U.S.-made vehicles are no longer regarded as being as sturdy and reliable as their Japanese competitors.

Similarly, American automakers are steadily acquiring a reputation for stonewalling consumers who run into expensive problems with their U.S.-made cars and trucks. Ford, in particular, has steadfastly refused to fix a lengthy string of calamitous problems, including:

The 3.8L V-6 Engine Used in the Windstar and other models, this all-aluminum engine tended to blow its head gasket every 60,000 miles or so. Ford finally issued an extended warranty to some owners but squeaked out of a class action suit that would most likely have resulted in a more stringent settlement.

Flaming Fords For years, Ford ignored the tendency of the F-150 and similar models to spontaneously burst into flames while parked with the engine off. Finally, in 2005, it issued a recall, although parts shortages have slowed its completion.

Crown Victoria Fires Police departments nationwide complained, filed suit and looked for alternatives to the popular but explosive Crown Vic. Ford insists that putting the gas tank behind the axle isn't dangerous but try telling that to those who've been killed or seriously burned when their cars exploded after being rear-ended.

Can Ford really afford to ignore problems and mistreat its faithful customers in this manner? Slick advertising campaigns and promises of green machines to come may not be enough to overcome the wrath and unending fury of consumers who have been hung out to dry by products they consider defective and a corporate response that amounts to a curt dismissal.

Ford's North American car and truck business is already bleeding money. Even though the company showed an overall profit, Ford lost $1.4 billion in North America before taxes during the first nine months of 2005.

The financial downside of such a vast recall along with the labor-intensive nature of the necessary repair suggest Ford will fight long and hard before admitting a manufacturing or design flaw has anything to do with the long list of blown number three cylinder spark plugs.

On the other hand, the reason Ford is losing money is not that it spends too much to build vehicles and fulfill its warranty commitments. It is losing money because it is not selling enough vehicles to cover its fixed costs.

Last week's R. L. Polk & Co. Loyalty Survey found Toyota bumping Ford from the #1 spot, ending Ford's nine-year reign.

Large manufacturing plants must operate close to or at capacity to be profitable. Most auto executives would agree that what Ford needs to become profitable is to sell more cars and trucks -- not to further alienate what remains of its customer base by making its consumers pay the tab for Ford's oversights.

When it announces its "turnaround" plan today, Ford is likely to announce a "new direction" for its sluggish minivan lineup.

The company's expected to move away from the traditional minivan look, characterized by sliding doors and a truck platform, and pursue a design similar to the car-like Fairlane concept wagon that it revealed at the Detroit auto show last year, Automotive News reported.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

October 14 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts



FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!






Back to the top |

Advertisement


AUTOMOTIVE
• Dealers
• Manufacturers
• Service
• Extended Warranties
• Lemon Laws
• Recalls
• Tires
• Transporters

FAMILY
• Aging
• Children, Parenting
• Recalls
• Dating
• Education
• Entertainment
• Pets
• Weddings
FINANCE
• Annuities
• Banks
• Credit Cards
• Debt Collection
• Debt Counseling
• Insurance
• Investing
• Loans
• Mortgages
• Payday Loans
• Student Loans
• Tax Prep

HEALTH
• Drugs, Pharmacies
• Health Clubs
• Hearing Care
• Hospitals
• Nursing Homes
• Nutrition, Diets
• Vision Care
• Weight Loss
HOMEOWNERS & RENTERS
• Appliances
• Cookware
• Furniture
• Home Improvements
• Lawn & Garden
• Movers
• Pools & Spas
• Realtors, Rental Agents
• Recalls
• Utilities

ELECTRONICS
• Cable TV/DBS
• Cameras
• Cell Phones
• Computers
• Home Electronics
• Internet Access
• Local Phone Service
• Long Distance
• VoIP
SHOPPING
• In-Home
• Online
• Retail Stores
• Supermarkets
• Telemarketers

TRAVEL
• Airlines
• Bus Lines
• Car Rental
• Cruises
• Hotels
• Travel Agents
• Trains

RESOURCES
• Class Actions
• Complaint Form
• Small Claims Guide
• Class Actions
• Lemon Laws
CONSUMER NEWS
• Latest News
• Automotive
• Telecom
• Financial
• Health
• Homeowners
• Scams
• Seniors
• Travel
• More ...

RECALLS
• Automotive
• Children's Products
• Drugs
• Food
• Household Products
• Sporting Goods

ABOUT US
• FAQ
• Privacy Policy
• Advertise With Us
• Newsroom
• Syndication
• Terms of Use

Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.