CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

New York Fines Cross Country Bank $9 Million



January 25, 2006
New York has ordered Cross Country Bank, one of the nation's largest subprime credit card issuers, to pay approximately $9 million in restitution and penalties for engaging in fraudulent, deceptive and illegal practices, Attorney General Eliot Spitzer announced.

Cross Country Bank
Consumer Complaints
Complaints about Applied Card Bank
---
News
New York Fines Cross Country Bank $9 Million
Collection Agency Agrees to Write Off Cross Country Debts Owed by West Virginians
Cross Country Bank To Pay WV $1.5 Million
Cross Country Ends WV Stand-Off
Cross Country Bank Fined $450,000 by PA
WV, Cross Country Swap Charges
West Virginia Sues Cross Country Affiliate
New York Rules Against Cross Country
Pennsylvania Sues Cross Country
Texas Suit

The decision is the latest in a series of favorable court rulings that Spitzer has obtained against the bank. In June 2004, the late State Supreme Court Justice Joseph R. Cannizzaro ruled that Cross Country Bank and its debt collector, Applied Card Systems, both of Wilmington, Delaware, engaged in fraud, false advertising, deceptive business practices and abusive debt collection practices.

"This office will aggressively pursue any lender using false and deceptive promises to profit on the backs of consumers with poor or limited credit records," Spitzer said.

Supreme Court Justice Thomas J. McNamara, who was assigned the case after Justice Cannizzaro's death, ordered Cross Country Bank to pay nearly $8 million in civil penalties. The decision also orders the bank to pay restitution to thousands of New Yorkers injured by its fraudulent and illegal acts.

Justice Cannizzaro's June 2004 decision ordered Cross Country Bank and Applied Card Systems to halt all of the illegal practices cited in Spitzer's lawsuit and scheduled further proceedings to determine the amount of restitution and penalties. Last month, the Appellate Division, Third Department, issued a unanimous opinion upholding that decision.

The Attorney General filed a lawsuit in 2003 alleging that Cross Country Bank used deceptive credit card solicitations to target consumers with poor credit records, offering credit lines of up to $2,500.

The vast majority of consumers, however, received only about $400 in credit, much of which was immediately applied to fees imposed by the bank, such as annual, application and monthly maintenance fees.

The effect of the limited credit lines and compounding fees and finance charges was to trap unwary consumers in a vicious cycle of pyramiding debt from which they could not escape.

As part of his lawsuit, the Attorney General also alleged that, after Cross Country Bank drove the cardholders into delinquency, its affiliate, Applied Credit Services, employed a variety of abusive and illegal collection techniques designed to harass cardholders into making a payment.

These unlawful tactics included:
• misrepresenting the caller's identity;
• making repeated, frequent and disruptive telephone calls;
• calling cardholders at their place of employment;
• using rude insulting and/or obscene language; and
• making false and improper threats.

In addition, the Attorney General alleged that Applied Card Systems debited payments from cardholders' accounts without authorization and misrepresented payoff amounts.

In ruling on the matter, Justice McNamara determined that a penalty of over $7.9 million was appropriate for Cross Country's fraudulent, deceptive and illegal practices. According to the judge, the penalty was warranted because "[the bank] engaged in a credit scheme, from solicitations to collections, to exploit the subprime market."

In assessing the size of the penalty, Justice McNamara considered several factors, including: the number of deceptive solicitations mailed to New York consumers; the number of New York account holders who exceeded their credit limits shortly after opening an account; the number of New York account holders who enrolled in a deceptive and valueless credit protection program; the number of New York account holders who complained of deceptive collection practices; and the enormous profit the bank made off of its victimized account holders.

Justice McNamara also ordered Cross Country Bank to refund more than $900,000 to consumers who: were assessed annual, origination, late and overlimit fees because they exceeded their credit limits within two months after opening their accounts; were enrolled in a credit protection program; paid fees to open secured credit card accounts; and/or were charged late or overlimit fees after being subjected to deceptive collection practices.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

September 8 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts



FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.



Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds |


Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.