NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS   RESOURCES  
Small Claims Guide   Class Actions   Lemon Laws   FAQ   Newsletters  
Share


Complain about a product or service

Automotive    Education    Employment    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Insurance    Pets    Shopping    Travel     Print This     Email This    



NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

NY Consumer Group Challenges Medicare Enrollment Numbers

Philadelphia Seniors Sue to Stop "Passive Enrollment"





February 21, 2006

Medicare Drug Plan
Save on your diabetes supplies Find the best deals on diabetes supplies - search now! - Adv.

Diabetes Drug Varies Widely In Price
Time to Review Medicare Drug Plan Options for 2009
House Passes Bill to Cut Medicare Prescription Drug Costs
Study Finds "Tremendous" Disparity In Medicare Prescription Drug Prices
Medicare Drug Plan Costs Rising
Medicare Call Centers Inadequate, Report Charges
Report: Shopping Around Beats Medicare Drug Prices
Confusion Ahead: New Medicare Plans for 2007
GAO Faults Medicare Help Lines
---
More Medicare News ...

An analysis of the Medicare drug benefit enrollment numbers being touted by the Bush Administration reveals that only 3.2 million older and disabled Americans have drug coverage for the first time, according to the Medicare Rights Center.

Meanwhile, a seniors' group in Philadelphia has filed a class action lawsuit challenging the procedure by which Pennsylvania residents eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid were enrolled in Medicare HMOs.

As many as 19 million people around the country have yet to sign up for the drug benefit available through private drug plans, and at least 7.5 million of these older and disabled Americans have no drug coverage at all, the Medicare Rights Center said.

"The Bush Administration's inflation of enrollment numbers disguises the problems that plague this privately-administered drug benefit," said Robert M. Hayes, the organization's president.

"Deception will do nothing to help older and disabled get the medications they desperately need," Hayes said.

The Bush Administration reports that 24 million people have the Medicare drug benefit, but the consumer group's analysis shows that only 14.3 have it. About 10 million people reported to have Part D coverage actually have retiree health benefits from their former employer or union.

Most people with the drug benefit known as "Part D" were auto-enrolled because they have both Medicaid and Medicare (6.2 million), or were in a Medicare private health plan (4.5 million), from which they got some drug coverage.

Of the 3.6 million people who reportedly "voluntarily" enrolled in a stand-alone private drug plan, about 330,000 were enrolled through their state pharmaceutical assistance program and another 78,000 are covered by employers who transformed their employer coverage to a Part D plan.

The full text of the Medicare Rights Center's analysis of the drug benefit enrollment numbers, is available online at http://www.medicarerights.org/policy_enrollment_brief022006.pdf.

Lawsuit Challenges Procedure

The Pennsylvania class action challanges the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services' (CMS) "passive enrollment" of 110,000 dual eligibles in Pennsylvania into Medicare HMOs.

CMS allowed 6 insurance companies which run both Medicaid and Medicare HMOs in the same area to send notices last October to duals who were in their Medicaid HMOs and who had original (fee-for-service) Medicare, telling them that they would be enrolled in that company's Medicare HMO effective January 1, 2006 unless they contacted the company by the end of October to say that they did not want to be enrolled.

The notices were confusing to many seniors, and when consumers called the insurance companies to say that they did not want to join the HMO, many of them were misled or subjected to an aggressive sales pitch, the suit charges.

"Passive enrollment has caused many people to have difficulty obtaining access to their health care providers, because they're not in the patient's new HMO's network," said Pedro Rodriguez of the Action Alliance of Senior Citizens of Greater Philadelphia.

"There have also been a number of problems getting medications, despite the fact that the HMOs promised to pay for all of the medications the members received while in the Medicaid HMO," Rodriguez said.

The suit charges that CMS had no legal authority to implement passive enrollment.

The lawyers have obtained documents in discovery which show that CMS decided to approve passive enrollment after getting lots of pressure from the managed care companies to do so, Rodriguez said.

A hearing on a request for a preliminary injunction is scheduled for March 7.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.

Share

Follow us on Twitter.

FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!





CONSUMER NEWS

SAFETY RECALLS

Back to the top |

Advertisement


Custom Search
AUTOMOTIVE
• Dealers
• Manufacturers
• Service
• Extended Warranties
• Lemon Laws
• Recalls
• Tires
• Transporters

FAMILY
• Aging
• Children, Parenting
• Recalls
• Dating
• Education
• Entertainment
• Pets
• Weddings
FINANCE
• Annuities
• Banks
• Credit Cards
• Debt Collection
• Debt Counseling
• Insurance
• Investing
• Loans
• Mortgages
• Payday Loans
• Student Loans
• Tax Prep

HEALTH
• Doctors
• Drugs, Pharmacies
• Health Clubs
• Hearing Care
• Hospitals
• Nursing Homes
• Nutrition, Diets
• Vision Care
• Weight Loss
HOUSE & HOME
• Appliances
• Cookware
• Furniture
• Home Improvements
• Lawn & Garden
• Movers
• Pools & Spas
• Realtors, Rental Agents
• Recalls
• Utilities

ELECTRONICS
• Cable TV/DBS
• Cameras
• Cell Phones
• Computers
• Home Electronics
• Internet Access
• Local Phone Service
• Long Distance
• VoIP
SHOPPING
• In-Home
• Online
• Retail Stores
• Sporting Goods
• Supermarkets
• Telemarketers

TRAVEL
• Airlines
• Bus Lines
• Car Rental
• Cruises
• Hotels
• Travel Agents
• Trains

RESOURCES
• Class Actions
• Complaint Form
• Small Claims Guide
• Lemon Laws
CONSUMER NEWS
• Latest News
• Automotive
• Telecom
• Financial
• Health
• Homeowners
• Scams
• Seniors
• Travel
• More ...

RECALLS
• Automotive
• Children's Products
• Drugs
• Food
• Household Products
• Sporting Goods

ABOUT US
• FAQ
• Privacy Policy
• Advertise With Us
• Newsroom
• Syndication
• Terms of Use

Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.