|
CONSUMER NEWS RECALLS COMPLAINT FORM SCAM ALERTS |
| Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish | |
|
|
![]() |
Americans Confused about Health Effects of Eating Fish |
|||||
|
March 16, 2006
In fact, consulting firm NPD says recent data from its Food Safety Monitor reveal that 67 percent of people are aware and concerned about mercury in fish/seafood, yet of those who do eat fish, 28 percent plan to eat more of it in the next month. With all the hype surrounding whether or not the benefits of eating fish/seafood outweigh any risk in consuming harmful substances, Americans are presumably quite confused about how to manage fish intake in their diets. Scaling back the fearThe Food and Drug Administration (FDA) says people should be eating an average of 12 ounces of fish per week to receive the maximum health benefits. According to NPD's Dietary Guidelines report, however, the average person only consumes just over three ounces of fish/shellfish in a typical week. Common sense would dictate that a person would have to eat over three times the current intake level just to reach the FDA's recommendation, and then exceed that amount in order for fish contaminants to become harmful. Although Americans are not consuming large amounts of fish on a regular basis, they do report eating tuna most frequently. Ironically, the FDA states that some kinds of tuna contain high levels of mercury relative to other types of fish. Still, considering how little fish people are actually eating, even if they decided to eat more of it, there is still some room to go before their intake would be considered harmful. Yet, many remain pushed and pulled about the health risks and benefits of fish consumption. Limiting fish consumptionThose eating larger amounts of fish have good reason to take heed and limit their intake. For women who are pregnant, or of childbearing age, high levels of mercury can cause serious developmental problems in fetuses, and can similarly compromise future pregnancies. While small traces of mercury are present in all fish, there are some varieties that contain higher levels and should not be eaten too frequently. However, there are rewards to be gained if consumed with caution. The pull to eat more fishFrom a weight loss/health perspective, many diet programs suggest eating more fish as it has long been touted as a high protein, low (saturated) fat food that contains omega-3 fatty acids. According to NPD's Dieting Monitor, 37 percent of adults are trying to add more omega-3 fatty acids to their diets. Together with the focus now on "healthy" fats, fish still stacks up very positively with its ability to help raise "good" cholesterol and lower the risk of mortality from cardiovascular disease. "Although we are seeing that consumers are aware and concerned about the mercury in fish issue, they are not deterred from eating more of it," said Kristin Nickels, product manager of NPD's Food Safety Monitor and Dieting Monitor. "It is clear that Americans are experiencing mixed messages about whether or not they should include fish in their diets," she added. Report Your Experience
|
|
||||
Advertisement
|
Home |
Complaint Form |
News |
Recalls |
FAQ |
|
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|