CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Feds Sue Calling Record Vendors





By Martin H. Bosworth
ConsumerAffairs.com

May 4, 2006

Calling Records
FTC Shuts Down Pretexting Operation
Phone Pretexters Get Off Cheap
Verizon Wireless Changes Customer Data Policy
FCC Strengthens Rules For Phone Privacy
House Tries Once More to Pass Pretexting Bill
Pretexting Bill: Pretense or Reality?
Hewlett-Packard Pays $14.5 Million to Settle Pretexting Suit
HP Scandal Ignites New Pretexting Battle In Congress
AT&T Sues Calling Record Brokers
Sprint Nextel Settles Case with Florida Data Broker
Feds Sue Calling Record Vendors
Illinois Lawsuit Charges Data Brokerages
Florida Judgment to End Data Broker's Business
Florida Investigates Fake Caller IDs
California Sues Data Trace USA for $10 Million
Missouri Sues Datatraceusa.com
Florida Sues Data Broker Over Sale of Phone Records
Texas Sues Companies Selling Telephone Calling Records
Websites Hawking Phone Records Shut Down
FTC Vows to Stop Illicit Sale of Cell Phone Calling Records
FTC Pledges "Vigorous" Pursuit of Cell Phone Record Sales
AT&T Accused of Eavesdropping, Calling Record Sales
Sprint Sues Cell Phone Record Brokers
Missouri Shuts Down Locatecell.com
Texas Probes Cell Phone Calling Record Sales, Missouri Files Suit
Illinois Sues Company Selling Cell Phone Calling Records
Outcry Over Sale of Cell Phone Calling Records

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has put companies that sell people's cell phone calling records to third parties on notice -- literally.

The FTC filed complaints against five companies that traffic in selling records, demanding they halt operations and return the money they made.

The companies and associated individuals targeted in the complaints include Yorktown, VA-based Integrity Security & Investigation Services, 77 Investigations and defendant Richard Kimbro of Upland, CA, and AccuSearch/Abika.com and Jay Patel of Cheyenne, WY.

The FTC charged the companies with violation of portions of the 1996 Telecommunications Act regarding the sale of Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI), and the FTC Act, which "prohibits unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce," according to the complaint filing.

The FTC complaints accuse the companies of "[using or causing] others to use, false pretenses, fraudulent statements, fraudulent or stolen documentation or other misrepresentations, including posing as a customer of a telecommunications carrier, to induce officers, employees, or agents of telecommunications carriers to disclose confidential customer phone records."

At least one company targeted for selling cellphone records denies the charges, according to the Washington Post. David Kacala, of Baltimore, MD-based Information Services, claimed that his company assists lawyers with investigations, and didn't sell any confidential information to the public.

The FTC action comes on the heels of legislation passed by the House of Representatives that would enforce criminal penalties for the sale and disclosure of individual cell phone records without customer consent.

The bill passed the House 409-0, and is set to be reconciled with similar legislation in the Senate.

The issue of cell phone record sales was brought to national prominence when blogger John Aravosis bought the cell phone records of former Presidential candidate Gen. Wesley Clark, and discussed it on his "AMERICABlog.com" site.

Since then, multiple states and all of the major cellphone carriers have filed suits against companies like LocateCell.com and DataTraceUSA.com.

In April 2006, Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan sued two out-of-state companies for falsely representing themselves as consumers or agents of cellphone providers in order to sell calling records to third parties.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

August 29 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts



FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.





Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds |


Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.