CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

The Hartford Apologizes, Pays $20 Million for Fraud in Annuity Sales



May 10, 2006
The Hartford

AARP Plans
Auto
Disability
Homeowners
Life
---
News
The Hartford Apologizes, Pays $20 Million for Fraud in Annuity Sales
California Accuses Hartford Insurance of Charging Illegal Fees

New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer and The Hartford Financial Services Group have reached an agreement resolving Spitzer's investigation of fraud in the sale of group annuities.

Under the agreement, The Hartford will pay $20 million in restitution and fines, and implement reforms designed to bring fair play and transparency to the marketing of retirement products. A similar agreement was announced today by Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal.

"This investigation shows how payoffs and deception influenced major deals for retirement products," Spitzer said. "This was wrong. But the company at the center of the scandal has acknowledged misconduct, provided compensation for those who were harmed, and implemented reforms that will help protect retirees in the future."

Hartford issued an apology for its acknowledged misconduct. The apology reads in part: "It was wrong to withhold from our pension plan customers the full amount of compensation paid to brokers in connection with the placements of these annuities."

The Attorney General’s office began its investigation of the marketing of retirement products last year after receiving tips indicating that insurance companies might be making secret payments to insurance brokers to recommend group annuities to pension plans.

Investigators confirmed that such payments were being made and that the payments were being concealed from pension plan managers, who believed that the brokers were acting on their behalf. But instead of acting as fiduciaries for the pension plans, the brokers had become, in effect, paid sales representatives for Hartford.

According to a complaint filed today with the settlement agreement, the scheme involved sham "expense reimbursement agreements" (ERAs) between Hartford and each of four brokers who held themselves out as trusted advisors to retirement plans: Dietrich & Associates; Brentwood Asset Advisors; BCG Terminal Funding; and USI Consulting Group.

The ERAs actually had nothing to do with expense reimbursements; they were simply volume-based bonuses designed to reward brokers for pushing Hartford products.

As one Hartford officer said in an email, the ERAs, which amounted to hundreds of thousands of dollars, were intended "to change the buying habit of the [brokers] . . . to stimulate business we would not otherwise get."

Hartford had a legal obligation to report these payments, but, instead, was careful to keep the ERAs secret.

One Hartford officer wrote in an email about the need to keep ERAs confidential: "If there is anyone we feel could leak, then we shouldn’t have this setup with them. I think that is the whole point, if they talk, the deal is terminated. We just have to reiterate that over and over to the selected brokers..."

The success of the covert scheme was critical for Hartford because it could not compete in the group annuity marketplace. As a company executive admitted in an internal e-mail: "Our prices are not competitive in open bidding situations."

With the aid of the brokers who participated in the scheme, Hartford was able to sell more than $800 million worth of group annuity pension plans from 1998 to 2004. Major companies and institutions that faced increased costs as a result of this scheme include: Montgomery Ward Co.; Bennetton Sportssystem USA., Inc; PriceWaterhouseCoopers; and Mt. Sinai Medical Center of Florida.

Under the settlement agreement, Hartford is obligated to improve disclosures and stop making the payments for a three-year period. The company will support legislation to curtail such payments thereafter.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

July 6 2008

Print, mail, etc.


Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts

FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.

Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Rogues Gallery | Good Guys | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | Search | Video | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds | Radio | Job Postings




Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.