CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Class Action Targets Wachovia



June 3, 2006

Wachovia

Wachovia Bank
Wachovia Credit Cards
---
News
Wachovia Penalized $144 Million for Telemarketing Abuses
Class Action Targets Wachovia

A Philadelphia man who was shot and disabled when he was six years old has filed suit against Wachovia Bank, charging that the bank charged "sweep fees" for funds held in mutual funds set up with donations at the time of the shooting.

Ralph Brooks, Jr. charges that the bank misrepresented or omitted to mention the existence and amount of the fees. The suit seeks class action status on behalf of all beneficiaries of fiduciary accounts for which the bank was corporate fiduciary whose assets were invested by the Bank in Evergreen Funds.

Also named as defendants in the suit are: Evergreen Investment Services, Inc., Evergreen Investment Management Company, LLC and Evergreen Distributors, Inc.

In 1988, when Brooks was six years old, he was shot near his home in North Philadelphia, leaving him paralyzed. In the wake of the shooting, The Philadelphia Daily News and Power 99 radio station ("WUSL-FM") publicized Brooks' plight and began to raise funds for his benefit.

Ultimately, more than $81,000 was raised and deposited with a predecessor of Wachovia Bank in a trust account for Brooks.

Brooks claims in the suit that the bank improperly used the assets in his and other fiduciary accounts to buy shares of the various captive Evergreen Funds for these accounts despite the availability of other mutual funds, such as those offered by the Vanguard Group or Fidelity Investments which were well-managed, had good reputations and had lower expenses than the Evergreen Funds.

He also claims that because the bank incurred no expenses in "sweeping" fiduciary accounts such as his, the bank's "sweep fees" were unreasonable and, as with other charges to his account, "double dipping."

The complaint alleges that the bank distributed Evergreen Funds prospectuses that misrepresented material facts and omitted material facts regarding conflicts of interest, the expenses that would be absorbed by the beneficiaries and the failure of the Trustees of the Evergreen Funds to seek advisory and administrative services in the best interests of the holders of Evergreen Funds shares.

Brooks is being represented by attorneys Richard D. Greenfield and Ann Miller.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

July 20 2008

Print, mail, etc.


Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts


FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.

Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Rogues Gallery | Good Guys | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | Search | Video | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds | Radio | Job Postings




Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.