CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Arizona Charges Wal-Mart, AutoZone with Consumer Fraud




Advertisement




Cheap Car Insurance
Insurance companies on TV can’t compete with our multi-quote system.
Click here for your quote!

July 7, 2006

Wal-Mart

General Complaints
Black Friday
Customer Service
Dangerous Products, Conditions
Grocery/SuperCenters
Lawn & Garden
Monogram Credit Card Bank
Pet Department
Pharmacy
Photos
Pricing Disputes, Errors
Returns
Sporting Goods
Tire & Lube
Vision Center
WalMart.com
---
Employees Complaints
---
News
Wal-Mart Selling Bassinets Blamed for Killing Two Babies
Wal-Mart Gaining On Grocery Chains
Black Friday Ads Target Wal-Mart
Wal-Mart Era Is Over, Wall Street Journal Declares
Consumers Respond to Toxic Wal-Mart Pet Toy Stories
Wal-Mart Expands $4 Generic Program
Lab Tests Find Lead, Other Toxins in Pet Toys Sold at Wal-Mart
Wal-Mart Plans Its Own Debit Card
Wal-Mart To Open In-Store Health Clinics
Wal-Mart Gives Up Bank Plans
Congressman Challenges Wal-Mart Banking Plans
Wal-Mart Expands Generic Drug Plan
Christmas Returns to Wal-Mart
Wal-Mart Jump-Starts the Holiday Shopping Season
Wal-Mart Cuts Generic Rx Prices To $4 In Florida
Wal-Mart Ending Its Layaway Program
FDIC Puts Retailers' Banking Plans on Hold
Wal-Mart/Sam's Club Settle with Connecticut on Pricing Violations
Congress May End Wal-Mart's Banking Dreams
Arizona Charges Wal-Mart, AutoZone with Consumer Fraud
Michigan Fines Wal-Mart $1.5 Million for Item Pricing Violations
Opposition Grows as FDIC Examines Wal-Mart Banking Bid
Wal-Mart's Banking Plans Draw Critics
Michigan Challenges Wal-Mart on Item Pricing
Wal-Mart May Stock "Emergency" Contraceptives
Black Friday Gives Wal-Mart a Black Eye
Connecticut Probes Wal-Mart Pricing
Wal-Mart Pushing Extended Warranties on Electronics
Bankers Oppose Wal-Mart's Entry into Banking
Wal-Mart Target Of Union-Led Boycott
Wal-Mart to Pay $14.5 Million for California Gun Law Violations
Wal-Mart Target Of Union-Led Boycott
Wal-Mart Tries to Buff Its Image

Arizona's Attorney General has filed consumer fraud lawsuits against AutoZone and Wal-Mart for their continued failure to correct pricing violations at their stores across Arizona.

Both retailers have been consistently cited by the Arizona Department of Weights and Measures (DWM) during the past five years for discrepancies between posted prices and checkout prices and for failing to post shelf prices on many products, Attorney General Terry Goddard said.

The companies have not contested the violations and have paid substantial fines, but both have yet to eliminate the pricing problems.

"Price accuracy is a fundamental consumer right which these companies have repeatedly abused," Goddard said.

"The state has made every effort to work with both of these retailers to no avail. When retailers fail to post and scan correct prices, there is no reasonable way for Arizona consumers to comparison shop. Shopping should not be a game of chance."

Each year the Department of Weights and Measures sends inspectors to retailers throughout Arizona to verify that prices are posted and that shelf prices match checkout prices. Violations occur when a store exceeds a 2 percent error rate.

Over the past five years, both AutoZone and Wal-Mart failed more than half of the inspections and continue to violate the state Consumer Fraud Act.

The lawsuits allege that the violations of both companies involve more than scanning overcharges at the cash register. They also include the failure to post prices for many products. When prices are not posted on the shelf, consumers are unable to compare prices or to know if they are accurately charged when they check out.

"AutoZone and Wal-Mart evidently see paying fines as the cost of doing business rather than making the effort to correct the problem," Goddard said. "Consumers have a legal right to know the accurate price of a product when they shop. These companies have consistently failed to comply with the law."

Since 2001, DWM has conducted 846 inspections of AutoZone stores throughout Arizona and failed 426. The violations included 190 for not posting prices and 236 for scanning overcharges. The repeated violations were not limited to one store, one city or one region in Arizona. DWM inspectors provided store managers with written inspection reports outlining the violations.

DWM also sent 220 Notice of Violation letters to AutoZone's corporate offices in Memphis identifying the violations, store locations and dates of inspection. During this time, AutoZone was fined more than $170,000 and continues to violate the law.

Since 2001, DWM has conducted 976 inspections of Wal-Mart stores throughout Arizona to determine compliance with Arizona law. The retailer failed a total of 526 DWM inspections, which included 366 price-posting violations and 160 price-scanning overcharges. The repeated violations were not limited to one store, one city or one region in Arizona.

DWM inspectors provided store managers with written inspection reports outlining the violations. DWM also has sent 260 letters to Wal-Mart at its corporate offices in Arkansas identifying the violations, store locations and dates of inspection.

During this time, Wal-Mart has paid more than $450,000 in fines and continues to violate the law. After being notified of these violations, both Wal-Mart and AutoZone were given opportunities to fix the problems. Both retailers, however, failed multiple re-inspections which led to additional fines.

AutoZone has been listed as one of the top 10 "Needs Most Improvement" companies on the annual DWM Price Verification Survey released to the public in 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Wal-Mart, the largest retailer in Arizona, has the highest number of price-posting violations in the state. The $450,000 in civil fines is also the most assessed against any retailer for pricing violations.

"Wal-Mart has tried to defend its inaccurate pricing by saying that while some customers are overcharged, others are undercharged," Goddard said. "It is not a defense to say we only defraud some of our customers some of the time."

Arizona is not the only state where Wal-Mart's pricing has come under legal scrutiny.

Earlier this year in Michigan, the company agreed to a record $1.5 million settlement to resolve claims that it committed repeated pricing violations. In Connecticut, the state Attorney General announced last November an investigation based on a national study that showed discrepancies between Wal-Mart's posted prices and scanned prices that far exceeded the 2 percent error rate.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

September 8 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts



FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.





Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds |


Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.