|
CONSUMER NEWS RECALLS COMPLAINT FORM SCAM ALERTS |
| Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish | |
|
|
![]() |
FTC Stamps Out Postal Job Scam |
|||||
|
September 1, 2006
The FTC charged that the operation misrepresented an affiliation with the Postal Service, the availability of postal jobs, and that getting a passing score on a postal entrance exam guarantees applicants a job. The defendants, Jeffrey Charles Lord and his company, Job Resources, Inc., are based in Tennessee. The agency also alleged that using the test preparation materials would not help anyone to pass the postal exam, contrary to the defendants' claims, and actually contained false and misleading information. The commission contended that, since at least January 2004, the defendants ran classified ads across the nation in employment guides and newspapers. The ads allegedly led consumers to believe that the defendants were hiring for postal jobs and were connected with, or endorsed by, the USPS. One ad stated:
According to the FTC, the telemarketers assured consumers there were jobs available in the caller's geographic area and that passing the exam required for postal employment would assure them a postal job. Consumers were charged a "registration fee" of $108.80. In fact, applicants for many entry-level postal jobs are required to take a postal examination. But the tests are usually offered only every few years in any particular district. Also, there are no job placement guarantees based on score. If applicants pass the test by scoring at least 70 out of 100, they are placed on a register, ranked by their score. When a position becomes open, the local post office looks to the applicable register for that geographic location and calls the top three applicants. The score is only one of many criteria taken into account for employment. Information on postal jobs is available at the consumer's local post office, and applicants generally receive a free packet of information about required exams. The exams test general aptitude, something that cannot necessarily be increased by studying. The settlement brings a permanent end to misrepresentations by the defendants that:
The order also prohibits the defendants from misrepresenting any material fact about products they are selling and enters a $2,093,183 suspended judgment against the defendants -- the total amount of consumer injury. Based on financial documents filed by the defendants, they will pay $105,000 because they are unable to pay more. If the court finds that they misrepresented their financial status, then they will be liable for the full amount. Report Your Experience
|
|||||
Back to the top | |
||||||
Advertisement
|
Home |
Rogues Gallery |
Good Guys |
Complaint Form |
News |
Recalls |
Search |
Video |
FAQ |
|
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. |