CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

States Struggle to Cut Highway Fatality Rate





By Dan Schlossberg
ConsumerAffairs.com

September 20, 2006

Auto Safety
Teen Misjudgment Major Factor in Highway Accidents
New Auto Safety Legislation Aims to Protect Children
Insurance Group: Supersport Motorcycles Deadly
Feds Consider Tougher Auto Safety Ratings
Congress Urged to Protect Children from Vehicle Deaths
Motorcycle Death Rates Rising, Safety Chief Warns
Feds to Require Additional Minivan Door Latch
Survey: Teens Still Driving Dangerously
Feds Propose Recorders to Monitor Truckers' Hours
Feds Propose New Auto Safety Tests
Consumers Choosing Tiny Cars Despite Safety Risks
IIHS: Bigger is Better in Car Safety
NHTSA's Dirty Little Secrets
Feds Find Backup Sensors Ineffective
Simpler Dashboards Might Make Cars Safer
States Struggle to Cut Highway Fatality Rate
Ford Makes Stability Control Standard for 2009
Feds Require Safety Info on New Car Window Stickers
Motorcycle, Pedestrian Deaths Rising
Safer Cars, Not Safer Drivers, Reducing Highway Deaths
Former Lobbyist in Driver's Seat at NHTSA
Must-Have Safety and Convenience Features for New Car Shopping
More ...

Falling gasoline prices, coupled with increasing airport hassles, have convinced many consumers to travel by car rather than air -- especially for trips of under 500 miles.

As a result, state transportation agencies are redoubling efforts to make roads safer. But paying for it often poses problems.

Budget crunches are forcing states to find low-cost ways to cope with highway safety issues. Such solutions range from repainting roadways to substituting cable for concrete when building barriers.

Highway fatalities rose 1.4 per cent last year over the year before and figure to top that percentage when 2006 figures are complete - unless innovative but inexpensive safety solutions work.

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, traffic accidents killed 43,443 people last year and 42,836 the year before. States are anxious to lower those numbers.

At least four states -- Illinois, New York, Texas, and Virginia -- are experimenting with optical speed bars, short parallel white lines perpendicular to the typical down-the-middle lines.

Four other states, including Maryland, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, and Washington State, are trying white dots designed to discourage tailgating.

Wisconsin officials say cable barriers - designed to prevent head-on collisions caused by motorists who cross lanes into oncoming traffic - work because they absorb impact better than concrete. They also don't cost as much.

Removing roadside barriers, from trees to light poles, also helps.

Many states have installed breakaway barriers, most notably on supports for overpasses, that "give" when struck by a car. Georgia, reacting to figures that show three of four fatalities occur when cars hit trees, is reacting by removing roadside trees.

Speed Bars

Seeing optical speed bars painted on the roadway is supposed to give drivers an optical illusion -- that they are going faster than they actually are. But do they work?

Virginia's Department of Transportation is completing a three-month test period that started in early summer. Skeptics insist the bars won't work because they are simply another road distraction, along with advertising billboards, highway signs, and painted signs that create turning lanes. Critics also contend that drivers can best monitor speed by checking speedometers frequently.

Advocates argue that speed bars have been proven effective in other countries (Virginia is among the states that sends transportation engineers on "scouting missions" outside their normal territory).

Such missions don't always work: Washington State junked a $30,000 dot-painting program after three days because it made rush-hour traffic worse. But traffic engineers there and elsewhere are still trying to implement ideas that will improve safety without breaking the bank.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

August 20 2008




FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.



Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Rogues Gallery | Good Guys | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | Search | Video | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds | Radio | Job Postings




Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.