Complain about a product or service

Crown Vic Marginal in Crash Test

By Joe Benton
ConsumerAffairs.com

September 19, 2006

IIHS-Auto Safety • Small Car Bumpers Fail to Prevent Expensive Damage • GM SUVs, Crossovers Win IIHS Safety Label • Insurance Group Adds 6 Small SUVs to Safety List • Luxury Sedan, SUV Win Insurance Industry Safety Award • Acura TSX Luxury Sedan Top Safety Pick • Nissan Murano Leads SUV Safety Test • Lexus EX35, Cadillac CTS Named Top Safety Picks • Nissan Quest Worst Performer in Minivan Bumper Test • Study: Crash Tests Predict Fatalities In Cars, Not Trucks • Top Safety Awards Go to 34 Cars, SUVs and a Pickup • Midsize SUVs Perform Poorly in Side Impacts • BMW 5 Series Performs Poorly in New Impact Test • Luxury Cars a "Mediocre Lot" in Low-Speed Collisions • Light Trucks Vulnerable to Whiplash --- • More IIHS Tests

The largest family car on the road, the 2007 Ford Crown Victoria earned only a marginal rating in a recent round of tests of vehicle equipped with side airbags conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.

Side airbags are optional equipment in the Crown Victoria.

The tests were conducted by IIHS at Ford’s request to update earlier tests of the Crown Victoria without side airbags. The institute also tested three other 2007 vehicles including the Toyota FJ Cruiser, Ford Freestyle, and Ford Fusion.

The FJ Cruiser and Freestyle earned good ratings from IIHS for protection in side crashes. The Fusion was rated acceptable. The Fusion was upgraded to standard side airbags for the 2007 model year. The Freestyle will have standard side airbags in 2007s built after September.

"We commend Ford for making side airbags standard in the Fusion and Freestyle," says Institute president Adrian Lund. "A few years ago, it was rare to find these standard in moderately priced family vehicles, but they're quickly becoming the norm."

The FJ Cruiser with optional side airbags earned a good rating and "intrusion into the occupant compartment was minimal," according to IIHS.

The Freestyle's structure did not perform quite as well, according to the report but the vehicle was rated good overall. "The dummies' heads were protected from hitting any hard structures by side curtain-style airbags that deploy from above the windows," according to the IIHS test results.

Both the Fusion and Crown Victoria with side airbags improved compared with the poor ratings earned by 2006 models tested without side airbags.

"In the new test of the Fusion, head protection was good but measures recorded on the driver dummy indicated that a fracture of the pelvis would be possible in a crash of this severity," the institute reported following the test.

The Fusion with side airbags earned an overall rating of acceptable for side impact protection.

"In the Crown Victoria, head protection also improved, but this car is rated marginal because of high forces recorded on the driver dummy's pelvis and poor structural performance," according to the test report.

Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.

Back to the top |