CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

NHTSA Refuses to Investigate Ford Explorer




Advertisement




Cheap Car Insurance
Insurance companies on TV can’t compete with our multi-quote system.
Click here for your quote!

By Joe Benton
ConsumerAffairs.com

September 5, 2006

Rollovers

Feds Delay New Roof-Crush Rule til October
Report: NHTSA Seeks More Time for Roof-Crush Rule
Senators Seek Delay in New Roof Strength Safety Rules
Senators Question Roof Strength Safety Rules
Nader Protests Feds' Roof Crush Plan
Treacherous Treads Still Taking Lives
Ford Class Action Settlement Leaves Consumers in the Dust
Feds' Roof Crush Rule Inadequate, Critics Charge
New Study: Stronger SUV Roofs Save Lives
Ford Loses $82 Million Rollover Verdict Appeal
Feds Delay Roof Strength Rule Again
Ford Settles Explorer Rollover Lawsuits
Safety Crusaders Seek Action on Roof Crush Injuries
Roof Crush Summit Highlights Safety Shortcomings
Feds Ignore Roof Crush Conference
Feds Delay New Roof Strength Rule
GM to Offer Rollover Airbags, Ford to Strengthen Roofs
Safety Groups Want Earlier Stability Control Rule
---
More about Rollovers ...

In an enormous victory for the Ford Motor Co., federal regulators will not conduct a formal investigation into claims that thousands of Ford Explorers built between 1997 and 2001 have unsafe roofs that violate federal safety standards.

The Detroit News reports that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration last week rejected a petition by California-based Safety Analysis & Forensic Engineering Research (SAFE) to retest 10 vehicles built during the period.

NHTSA turned down the request after a year of reviewing a SAFE Research argument that many Explorers did didn't meet Federal Safety Standard 216, which requires that vehicle roofs withstand a force equal to at least 1.5 times the vehicle's unloaded weight.

The group, which does work for lawyers suing automakers, based its findings on two roof strength tests Ford conducted in 1999, which the company said were to test a prototype windshield design that was never put into production.

Steven Forrest, a senior engineer and principal with SAFE Research criticized the NHTSA decision and expressed bitter disappointment.

"I am not the least bit surprised due to the obvious political and economic ramifications for Ford," Forrest said. NHTSA spokesman Rae Tyson denied anything but safety was a factor in the decision.

Ford spokesman Dan Jarvis praised NHTSA's decision.

"We felt all along and still do that this report SAFE issued a year ago was based on junk science," Jarvis said. "You can't take a prototype vehicle and make the leap somehow that it relates to vehicles on the road."

Ford has faced hundreds of lawsuits stemming from Explorer rollovers. And the company has been hit with several multi-million dollar jury verdicts in cases in which plaintiffs alleged the Explorer's roof was too weak.

Rollover deaths continue to rise in the United States, accounting for 25 percent of all traffic deaths, up 2.1 percent to 10,816 in 2005, according to a government report NHSTA issued last month.

The NHTSA decision comes as the agency continues to review the question of roof strength.

In August 2005, the agency proposed raising the roof strength standard to 2.5 times the vehicle's unloaded weight, but has run into opposition from automakers, who want different testing procedures.

No final rule is expected until at least next fall and a new standard wouldn't take effect until 2010 at the earliest.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

August 29 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts



FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.





Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds |


Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.