Complain about a product or service

Judge Lifts Injunction Against Video Game

October 16, 2006

1st Amendment • Craiglist Bites Back, Answers Connecticut AG • Connecticut Wants Craiglist to Pull Prostitution Ads • Craiglist Cleared in Biased-Postings Suit • Ionic Breeze Suit Drives Sharper Image into Bankruptcy • Video Professor Drops Subpoena, Goes After Wikipedia Users • Court Ruling Protects Anonymous Bloggers • AT&T Changes Terms Of Service After Outcry • AT&T Stiffens Language Covering Objectionable Content • Blogger, Journalist, Citizen: Which is Which? • Consumers Revolt Against High-Priced Media • Senate Press Gallery Ejects Consumer Journalist • Report Calls for More 'Transparency' in Congress • Builders, Contractors Hammer Consumer Sites • New York Upholds Consumers' Right to Criticize • Judge Lifts Injunction Against Video Game • Florida Dentists Drop Efforts to Silence Critical Web Site • EFF Files Suit to Protect Journalist From Drug Company Intimidation • Sharper Image Loses First Amendment Case Against Consumers Union • Life Alert Drops 2 of 3 Claims Against ConsumerAffairs.com

A judge in Florida has lifted an injunction that would have blocked the release of a video game that a Miami lawyer found objectionable.

This week's scheduled release of a game called "Bully," set in a fictional private school, was challenged by Jack Thompson, described as an "anti-video game attorney." His lawsuit asked the court to stop release of the game on the grounds that is was "witless and crass."

Miami-Dade County Circuit Court Judge Ronald Friedman agreed to bar release of the game but, after reviewing it, decided to lift the injunction.

"There's a lot of violence," he said but added it was, "a whole lot ... less than we see on television every night."

The game will have a teen-only rating in the US and a 15 rating in the UK. It is being released under the title "Canis Canem Edit", Latin for Dog Eat Dog, in the UK.

Thompson sent an open letter criticising Friedman and his methods, stating: "What you conducted in your chambers, Judge, was the equivalent of Iran leading UN weapons inspectors around the country taking them to places where the illegal activity was not occurring," gamesindustry.biz reported.

The constitionality of the judge's acting as censor is questionable, critics noted.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1931 that injunctions placed on material before publication is a violation of the Constitution's free speech protections.

In a follow-up ruling 40 years later, the court ruled that an injunction "constitutes an impermissible restraint on First Amendment rights."

"If it's not on the market yet, I find it hard to imagine a basis for the prepublication review of the game," Robert Corn-Revere, a partner at law firm Davis Wright Tremaine, told CNET.

The video game is produced by Take-2 Interactive, which also produces "Grand Theft Auto." The Web page for the new game describes "Bully" as "humorous, tongue-in-cheek storytelling set in the schoolyard."

"As a mischievous schoolboy, you'll stand up to bullies, get picked on by teachers, play pranks, win or lose the girl, and ultimately learn to navigate the obstacles of the worst school around, Bullworth Academy -- a corrupt and crumbling prep school with an uptight facade."

Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.