|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
Net Neutrality Back on Congress' Agenda |
|||||||||||||
|
By Martin H. Bosworth January 9, 2007
Senators Byron Dorgan (D-ND) and Olympia Snowe (R-ME) have introduced the "Internet Freedom Preservation Act," which would mandate network service providers to operate in a "nondiscriminatory" manner. Supporters of net neutrality fear that telecommunications and cable companies want to prioritize service for clients who pay higher rates, while charging content providers extra fees over and above the millions they now pay for Internet access. In a statement supporting the legislation, Dorgan said that service discrimination would "fundamentally change the way the Internet has operated and threatens to derail the democratic nature of the Internet." Dorgan claimed that the values of the marketplace picked "winners and losers" for the Internet, not "central gatekeepers." The bill would amend existing laws to enable broadband providers to offer different levels of service, as long as basic access was not slowed down or degraded as a result. It would require clear disclosure of the terms of a user's service, including how fast their Internet connections actually are. The proposed legislation would also mandate that providers offer "stand-alone" or "naked" Internet access, without requiring customers to sign up for "bundled" packages that include telephone and cable The Dorgan-Snowe bill was co-sponsored by a number of heavy hitters in the Senate, including John Kerry (D-MA), Barbara Boxer (D-CA), Patrick Leahy (D-VT), and possible 2008 candidates Hillary Clinton (D-NY) and Barack Obama (D-IL). The bill had been introduced in the previous Congress during contentious debates on updates to the Communications Act, but failed to pass. Debate over net neutrality ended up stalling the passage of any major telecom legislation, as author and former Commerce Committee chairman Ted Stevens (R-AK) failed to round up the 60 votes necessary to ensure a majority for passage. Sen. Snowe hailed the reintroduction of the Internet Freedom Preservation Act as proof that "[t]he tide has turned in the debate between those who seek to maintain equality and those who would benefit from the creation of a toll road on the Internet super highway." Consumer groups and media activists also touted the bill's return as a positive step. Ben Scott, policy director of the Free Press media watchdog group, said that "[t]he American public has an overwhelming interest in seeing this bill pass into law, ensuring that the online marketplace of ideas remains open and vibrant." One Small StepThe bill's reintroduction comes on the heels of the approval of the AT&T-BellSouth corporate merger, which creates the world's largest telecommunications company. The merger had been held up for weeks until AT&T offered concrete -- though temporary -- promises to protect net neutrality as part of a concession package. The merger was then swiftly approved on Dec. 30, 2006. Some observers claimed that AT&T's deliberately vague choice of language would enable it to sidestep the rules, while others, such as Columbia University professor Tim Wu, argued that the exceptions would only apply to AT&T's private network services, while the company's basic consumer Internet service would be protected by net neutrality principles. Members of the House of Representatives have also discussed net neutrality legislation, with both Democrats and Republicans agreeing that the new Congress would be much more favorable to action on the issue. Rep. Rick Boucher (D-VA) told National Journal that "[t]he broadband providers need to have this issue resolved. It's not going to go away…Nothing is going to pass unless this net neutrality issue is passed." Report Your Experience
|
|||||||||||||
Back to the top | |
||||||||||||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|