CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

InPhonic Settles With D.C.

Settlement Provides for Unspecified Restitution





By Joseph S. Enoch
ConsumerAffairs.com

February 26, 2007

Inphonic/Wirefly
Cell Phone
Inphonic Complaints
Wirefly Complaints
InPhonic Responds
---
News
Feds Slam InPhonic for Deceptive Rebate Practices
InPhonic Settles With D.C.

InPhonic, a business that sells wireless phones and service plans to customers throughout the country, has settled with the District of Columbia attorney general after thousands of complaints from consumers spurred the office to take action.

InPhonic sells popular phones and wireless services, such as Verizon Wireless, Cingular, T-Mobile and Sprint through its retail websites, Liberty Wireless and Firefly. The websites sell the merchandise at unusually low prices by offering large rebates.

The catch is that the rebate terms and conditions are confusing and even when they are met, many consumers say they still never receive those rebates.

ConsumerAffairs.com has received 165 complaints from consumers who thought they found excellent deals from InPhonic.

"I purchased a LG 5225 phone through www.libertywireless.com with the offer of a $100 rebate," Henry of Providence, R.I. wrote.

"I mailed the rebate form within 120 days of activation and my liberty wireless account remained current and active for 180 days since activation. I fulfilled all the obligations of the rebate contract. The activation date was 9/15/05 and the rebate form was mailed within the month of September. The rebate was promised within 4-6 weeks after 180 days of activation. Despite numerous inquiries, I still have not received the check as of now (9/21/06)," he said.

With 3,922 complaints logged against the company through the Better Business Bureau and the D.C attorney general's office, D.C. sued InPhonic in June 2006. Last week, the acting attorney general, Linda Singer, settled with the company.

Under the terms of the settlement, InPhonic must pay $100,000 to the District and make restitution to about 9,000 customers nationwide.

Two categories of consumers will be eligible for restitution payments:

(1) those who complained to either a government agency or a Better Business Bureau ("BBB"), anywhere in the United States, by February 15, 2007;

(2) those whose rebates were denied by InPhonic for any of the following four reasons -- the consumer failed to provide the "Guide to Wireless Service"; the consumer failed to provide a carrier invoice with a bill date or failed to provide an order number on their rebate submission; or the consumer's rebate submission was missing customer information.

There's no word yet on what the restitution exactly is because Singer's office is still gathering complaints, Traci Hughes, Singer's spokeswoman said.

Consumers who meet the above criteria can call Singer's complaint hotline in the next five months to add their names to the list of people who can receive restitution. That number is: (202) 442-9828.

InPhonic published a two paragraph press release in response to the settlement in which David Steinberg, the company's chairman and CEO says:

"We are pleased to put this matter behind us. We have had a great working dialogue with the Attorney General's Office, and we thank the Attorney General and her staff for their fairness and cooperation in closing this matter. InPhonic has made several enhancements to our customer experience and we continue to improve communication relating to the rebate process. Over the last year, InPhonic has engaged a new third-party rebate provider, significantly expanded our rebate customer service team internally and improved our rebate processes to ensure a positive experience for our customers."

There are no specifics on the "enhancements" Steinberg refers to and Inphonic did not return three phone calls from ConsumerAffairs.com seeking clarification.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

September 8 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts



FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.





Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds |


Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.