|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
New York Upholds Consumers' Right to CriticizeCompanies Can Not Stifle Their Customers' Free Speech Rights |
|||||||||||||
|
February 19, 2007
The settlement with Blue Coat Systems, Inc. resolves a dispute over the company's use of end user license agreements that claimed to prevent consumers from testing and criticizing Blue Coat products. Blue Coat is a leading developer of enterprise-level security hardware and software products. Before the attorney general's action, Blue Coat included language within its End User License Agreements that required the company's permission in order to publish test results comparing Blue Coat products to competitors' products (often called "benchmark tests"). Many Blue Coat customers did not even have the opportunity to review the License Agreement before purchasing the product; Blue Coat's terms were only revealed to consumers after the purchase. "Companies don't have the right to pick and choose who can test their products, nor can they legally silence criticism," Cuomo said. "Companies that believe in their products should welcome the free exchange of information and opinions -- not threaten legal action against critics." "In this case, many customers did not even have an opportunity to soldier through a lengthy license agreement -- which threatened their rights -- until buying the product. That is unacceptable." The Attorney General's office began investigating Blue Coat after receiving a complaint from a third party that Blue Coat had invoked the "anti-benchmarking" clause to prevent the third party from publishing test results about Blue Coat's proxy servers. In agreeing to settle the case without litigation, Blue Coat agreed not to include anti-benchmarking clauses in license agreeements with New York parties -- or any other clause that interferes with a third party's right to test and comment on Blue Coat's products. Blue Coat has also agreed not to seek to enforce anti-benchmarking clauses included in earlier license agreements with New York consumers. Blue Coat has also agreed to pay the State of New York $20,000 in penalties and $10,000 for the costs of investigation. Report Your Experience
|
|||||||||||||
Back to the top | |
||||||||||||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|