|
CONSUMER NEWS RECALLS COMPLAINT FORM SCAM ALERTS |
| Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish | |
|
|
![]() |
Feds Charge Mystery Shopping PromotersFTC Seeks Court Order, Contempt Charges Against Defendants |
||||||
|
March 26, 2007
The FTC also charged the mystery shopping operation with contempt for violating a previous FTC order, and is seeking redress for consumers, who lost millions of dollars. The FTC alleged that in exchange for the $99.95 fee for one year of service, consumers thought they would be trained and certified as mystery shoppers, and would gain access to job postings available through the company, with enough paid assignments available to ensure a steady part-time or full-time income. Instead, consumers received a worthless certification and access to re-postings of other mystery shopping assignments posted by other companies, who were unrelated to the defendants. Consumers still had to apply for these jobs, most of them low-paying, and had no advantage over anyone else who found the postings elsewhere for free. According to the FTC, the defendants misrepresented that:
The promoters advertised in newspapers, radio, and cable television, inviting consumers to call a toll-free number for more information. The telemarketers assured consumers that there were a specific number of mystery shopping jobs available in their area, often a number in the hundreds or even thousands, and that consumers could make as much money as they wanted by deciding how many assignments to accept. The telemarketers promised consumers that they would make from $200 to $500 a week, and would earn their money back within one to two weeks. They also told consumers that there was a shortage of mystery shoppers in their local area, allowing them to pick and choose from the large percentage of shopping assignment that go unfulfilled. In fact, there was no shortage of mystery shoppers. There were far fewer jobs available than what consumers were told, most were low paying, and very few consumers who signed up even made enough money to cover the fee. While the agency has reason to believe that the operation recently stopped making sales, the FTC is asking a District Court to enter an order barring the defendants from making the deceptive claims, in case they start up sales again. The FTC complaint names the companies and individuals responsible for the mystery shopping operation -- Mystery Shop Link, LLC, Tangent Group, LLC, Robin Larry Murphy, Kenneth Johnson, and Andrew Holman -- and those responsible for the telemarketing firm that handled the majority of the inbound telemarketing calls from consumers responding to the ads -- Harp Marketing Services Inc., Aiden Reddin, and Marc Gurney. In addition, the FTC is charging the defendants behind the mystery shopping operation with contempt. Robin Larry Murphy is already under FTC order from FTC v. Stratified Advertising and Marketing, Inc. In that case, the FTC charged the defendants falsely pitched the availability of government jobs in consumers' chosen fields and geographic location and misrepresented to consu Report Your Experience
|
||||||
Back to the top | |
|||||||
Advertisement
|
Home |
Complaint Form |
News |
Recalls |
FAQ |
|
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|