|
|
CONSUMER NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters Spanish |
|
|
![]() |
Merck Wins Vioxx Case In Illinois |
|||||
|
March 27, 2007
The jury rejected the plaintiff's case that Vioxx was a bad drug, with defects in its design and not enough testing before being approved as a painkiller. Instead, the seven men and five women found that Merck had provided ample warnings about Vioxx's risks, and that Schwaller's physician was well aware of them when he prescribed the drug. Merck's lawyers argued there were other, more probable causes of Schwaller's heart attack. They maintained her family had a history of the ailment, that she was morbidly obese, suffered from high blood pressure and diabetes, and lived a sedentary life style. Merck has refused to entertain offers of a Vioxx settlement and has insisted so far on trying each case against it separately. In trials that have produced a jury verdict, the pharmaceutical giant has notched ten acquittals against five defeats. It faces at least 27,000 more lawsuits over the once-popular arthritis drug. Vioxx was withdrawn from the market in September 2004 after a clinical trial showed that it doubled the risk of heart attack and strokes in patients who took it for at least 18 months. Report Your Experience
|
|
||||
Advertisement
|
Home |
Complaint Form |
News |
Recalls |
FAQ |
|
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|