FTC Sues Company for Financing NorVergence Scheme

June 8, 2007
In the wake of the NorVergence Inc. telecommunications fraud case won by the Federal Trade Commission in 2005, the agency has charged IFC Credit Corporation with violating federal law by helping to finance the scheme and continuing to seek payment from defrauded consumers.

NorVergence • Consumer Complaints • Inside NorVergence --- News • FTC Resolves NorVergence's Unfinished Business • FTC Sues Company for Financing NorVergence Scheme • Texas Sues NorVergence Debt Collector • States Settle NorVergence Claims with 10th Leasing Company • FTC Settles NorVergence Case • Norvergence Forfeits $47 Million In FTC Settlement • California Settles with USB Leasing • States Settle with Three Leasing Companies • GE Capital Agrees to NorVergence Settlement • Leasing Companies Release Florida Customers from NorVergence Leases • Massachusetts Sues NorVergence • Illinois Sues NorVergence • FTC Charges NorVergence • Florida Sues 12 Leasing Companies In NorVergence Case • States Open Investigation

Texas sued the same company just a few days ago.

Based on an FTC complaint filed in 2004, a federal court voided 1,600 NorVergence contracts with small businesses and religious and other nonprofit organizations that were misled by promised savings on phone and Internet services.

The contracts purported to be long-term rental agreements for a relatively inexpensive device that NorVergence falsely claimed would create the savings.

NorVergence was forced into bankruptcy, and the promised services stopped. The judgment the FTC obtained against NorVergence left unaffected thousands of rental agreements NorVergence had already sold to finance companies.

According to a complaint filed by the FTC, IFC Credit Corporation purchased NorVergence rental agreements valued at $21 million, with individual contracts ranging from $4,439 to $160,672. Despite making payments, the complaint alleges, no customers received telecommunications services from NorVergence for more than a short period of time, and many consumers received none.

As stated in the complaint, IFC continued to finance the fraudulent scheme by accepting new rental contracts, despite NorVergence's failure to provide the promised services and the resulting high rate of default among IFC customers.

Long after NorVergence entered bankruptcy in 2004, the complaint states, IFC continues to tell consumers they are obligated under the rental agreements because the payments are for the device, not for services.

Under the FTC Act, which prohibits unfair or deceptive business practices, the FTC charges IFC with misrepresenting that consumers have no defenses to payment on the NorVergence rental agreements; harming consumers by unfairly accepting and collecting on the rental agreements; and unfairly filing debt collection lawsuits in courts far from consumers’ locations.

In Texas, Attorney General Greg Abbott asked a Harris County District Court to prevent IFC Credit from attempting to recover fraudulently incurred debts from Texas small businesses and nonprofits.

“Small businesses are critical to the success of Texas’ economy,” said Attorney General Abbott. “The Office of Attorney General is committed to protecting small business owners from fraudulent schemes and unlawful debt collection practices. Texans can rest assured we will aggressively protect NorVergence victims from continued suffering because of this illegal, fraudulent scheme.”

More Scam Alerts ...

Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.

Share		Follow us on Twitter.

Back to the top |