CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Light Trucks Vulnerable to Whiplash

Insurance Institute Finds Most Trucks, SUVs Fall Short




Advertisement




Cheap Car Insurance
Insurance companies on TV can’t compete with our multi-quote system.
Click here for your quote!

By Joe Benton
ConsumerAffairs.com

July 23, 2007

IIHS-Auto Safety

Acura TSX Luxury Sedan Top Safety Pick
Nissan Murano Leads SUV Safety Test
Lexus EX35, Cadillac CTS Named Top Safety Picks
Nissan Quest Worst Performer in Minivan Bumper Test
Study: Crash Tests Predict Fatalities In Cars, Not Trucks
Top Safety Awards Go to 34 Cars, SUVs and a Pickup
Midsize SUVs Perform Poorly in Side Impacts
BMW 5 Series Performs Poorly in New Impact Test
Luxury Cars a "Mediocre Lot" in Low-Speed Collisions
Light Trucks Vulnerable to Whiplash
---
More IIHS Tests

More than half of the 87 light trucks, pickups and sport utility vehicles tested for rear crash protection by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety provided only marginal or poor protection from neck injuries.

Head restraints in dozens of sport utility vehicles, pickup trucks and minivans fell short in simulated crashes conducted by the insurance group.

The IIHS reported that the simulated rear crashes at 20 mph showed that many large vehicles did not adequately protect against neck injuries, which lead to 2 million insurance claims a year.

The test results found that several SUVs had improved protections against whiplash injuries, but the IIHS gave poor marks to vehicles made by several automakers, including BMW AG, DaimlerChrysler AG, Ford Motor Co., General Motors Corp., Nissan Motor Co. and Toyota Motor Corp.

But David Zuby, vice president of vehicle research for the IIHS, said the test results showed there was plenty of room for improvement.

"In stop-and-go commuter traffic, you're more likely to get in a rear-end collision than any other crash type," said Zuby. "It's not a major feat of engineering to design seats and head restraints that afford good protection in these common crashes."

Neck injuries are the most common reported in auto crashes, accounting for 2 million insurance claims annually, according to IIHS.

Safety experts say the head and torso must move together to minimize the risk of whiplash. Head restraints must be high enough and close to the back of the head, and seats should meet certain stiffness criteria.

The institute's tests included measuring seat geometry and simulating crashes at 20 miles per hour using a dummy designed to measure neck forces. Performances were rated either poor, marginal, acceptable or good.

In the 2007 evaluation, 17 of 59 SUV models were rated good and five were acceptable. The remaining 37 were marginal or poor. In 2006, only six of 44 SUVs earned good ratings.

In vans, three were rated good and two acceptable. In pickups, one model posted a 'good' score, while five were acceptable. The remaining 11 were marginal or poor.

The redesigned 2007 Tundra from Toyota was the only pickup that received a good rating.

The best performers among 2007 SUVs included the Acura MDX and RDX; Lincoln MKX; Ford Edge; Honda CR-V, Element and Pilot; Hyundai Santa Fe; Jeep Grand Cherokee, and Volvo XC90.

SUVs from the 2007 model year rated poor included the GMC Envoy, BMW X3 and X5 and the Toyota 4Runner and Highlander.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

July 20 2008

Print, mail, etc.


Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts


FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.



Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Rogues Gallery | Good Guys | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | Search | Video | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds | Radio | Job Postings




Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.