CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

BMW 5 Series Performs Poorly in New Impact Test

Kia Amanti places above higher-priced models




Advertisement




Cheap Car Insurance
Insurance companies on TV can’t compete with our multi-quote system.
Click here for your quote!

By Joe Benton
ConsumerAffairs.com

August 16, 2007

IIHS-Auto Safety

Acura TSX Luxury Sedan Top Safety Pick
Nissan Murano Leads SUV Safety Test
Lexus EX35, Cadillac CTS Named Top Safety Picks
Nissan Quest Worst Performer in Minivan Bumper Test
Study: Crash Tests Predict Fatalities In Cars, Not Trucks
Top Safety Awards Go to 34 Cars, SUVs and a Pickup
Midsize SUVs Perform Poorly in Side Impacts
BMW 5 Series Performs Poorly in New Impact Test
Luxury Cars a "Mediocre Lot" in Low-Speed Collisions
Light Trucks Vulnerable to Whiplash
---
More IIHS Tests

The 2008 BMW 5 Series was the worst performer in side-impact crash tests of luxury sedans conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.

The Acura RL, Kia Amanti and Volvo S80 all earned the highest safety rating from IIHS.

The Cadillac STS and Mercedes E-Class earned the second-highest rating.

IIHS designed the side-impact tests to demonstrate what happens if a truck or sport utility vehicle hits the side of the sedan at 31 mph or the speed of a serious crash.

All of the luxury sedans were equipped with standard side air bags. The air bags in the BMW 5 Series protected the head, but separate air bags designed to protect the chest and stomach area performed poorly, according to the IIHS test results.

The Kia Amanti was one of the lowest priced sedans in the group, with a starting price of about $25,500 but the Kia offered more protection than more expensive entries. The BMW 5 Series starts at $43,500, while the Mercedes E-Class starts at $50,550.

The Volvo S80 also won the institute's top safety award for overall crash protection, since it scored the highest ratings in front, side and rear crash tests and has electronic stability control as standard equipment.

Side-impact crashes are the most common type of fatal crash after a frontal crash, killing around 9,000 people in 2005, according to IIHS.

"Growing sales of SUVs and pickups have exacerbated height mismatches among passenger vehicles, thereby increasing the risks to occupants of many vehicles struck in the side," Insurance Institute President Adrian Lund said in a news release.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

July 6 2008

Print, mail, etc.


Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts


FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.



Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Rogues Gallery | Good Guys | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | Search | Video | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds | Radio | Job Postings




Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.