CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Wal-Mart Reviewing Results of Tests on China-Made Pet Toys

Consumer Product Safety Commission ignores inquiries, FDA claims no jurisdiction





By Lisa Wade McCormick
ConsumerAffairs.com

Copyright © 2007 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved

September 17, 2007

RECALL LIST
Consumer Complaints
---
News
Illness, Death Dog Nutro Pet Food
Feds Raid PETCO Warehouse in Illinois
Pet Owners Not Thrilled with Poison Food Settlement
CDC Links 2006 Salmonella Outbreak to Dog Food
FDA Orders Illinois Pet Food Maker to Clean Up Its Act
String of Illnesses Afflicts NUTRO-Fed Pets
Pet Owners Not Thrilled with Poisoning Settlement
Menu Foods Settles Pet Food Class Action
Many Pet Foods Still Missing From Store Shelves
Pet Owners Cheer Indictments in Toxic Pet Food Case
Indictments in Toxic Pet Food Case
Diamond Pet Foods Agrees To $3.1 Million Settlement
Tests Find More Toxic Pet Toys
Finding Safe Toys to Give Your Pet
China Agrees to Stepped-Up Food, Drug Inspections
Menu Foods Denies Acetaminophen Found in its Cat Food
Veterinarians Solve Pet Food Death Puzzle
Menu Foods Agrees to Test for Pain Killer in its Cat Food
Lab Tests Again Find Acetaminophen in Pet Food
Toxic Pet Toys: A Doctor's Advice
Consumers Respond to Toxic Wal-Mart Pet Toy Stories
Federal Import Safety Panel Outlines Proposals
Pet Industry Agrees on Need for Toxicity Standards
Industry Responds to Reports of Lead in Wal-Mart Pet Toys
Wal-Mart Attacks Lab Tests that Found Lead, Chromium in Pet Toys
Wal-Mart Reviewing Results of Tests on China-Made Pet Toys
Lab Tests Find Lead, Other Toxins in Pet Toys Sold at Wal-Mart
CANIDAE Denies Reports of Painkiller in its Pet Food
Lab Tests Find Painkiller in Samples of Pet Food
Purina Denies Claim on Bichon Frise Deaths
FDA Blocks Nutro Pet Food Shipment from Entering U.S.
FDA Testing Dog Treats Pulled from Wal-Mart Shelves
Wal-Mart Finds Melamine in Chinese-Made Dog Treats
---
More about Pet Food Recalls ...

Wal-Mart said today that it’s reviewing the laboratory results on two Chinese-made pet toys sold at its stores that -- according to a forensic toxicologist whose company tested the products for ConsumerAffairs.com -- contain elevated levels of lead, chromium, and cadmium.

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission -- which says it needs more money to protect consumers -- did not respond to our inquiries, either last week or today.

And a pet owner in Michigan called on consumers to stop buying pet toys that are made in China.

ConsumerAffairs.com hired ExperTox Analytical Laboratory in Texas to test four Chinese-made pet toys -- two for dogs and two for cats -- for heavy metals and other toxins.

One of the dog toys -- a latex one that looks like a green monster -- tested positive for what the lab’s toxicologist said are high levels of lead and the cancer producing agent chromium.

A cloth catnip toy also tested positive for “a tremendous amount” of the toxic metal cadmium.

But two veterinarians said the levels of toxic metals in the toys do not pose a health risk to dogs or cats. Whether the toys are a hazard to children and adults who handle them isn't clear.

ExperTox also analyzed two other Chinese-made pet toys – a cloth hedgehog for dogs and a plastic dumbbell toy for cats. The lab detected cadmium in those toys, but said the levels were “about the amount you’d find in one cigarette” and not considered significant.

ConsumerAffairs.com purchased the four pet toys earlier this month at a Wal-Mart store in Kansas City, Missouri. All the toys had a tag attached that read “Marketed by Wal-Mart stores and Made in China.”

ConsumerAffairs.com on Friday sent a copy of the lab’s results to Wal-Mart. Today, a company spokeswoman asked us for more information about the chew toys – specifically the UPC codes.

“As soon as this detail is received we will involve our Compliance Safety group who can initiate testing among a sample with the independent labs we use that are government approved for product testing,” Melissa O'Brien, with Wal-Mart’s corporate communications division, wrote us in an e-mail.

After we provided that information, O’Brien told us: “We will follow up with our Compliance Safety group on this today and let you know our actions.”

As ConsumerAffairs.com first reported on Sunday, forensic toxicologist Dr. Ernest Lykissa, Ph.D., director of ExperTox’s lab, described the levels of heavy metals in the green monster and catnip toys as potentially toxic and said Wal-Mart should pull the products off the market.

“Or put a warning label on them that says if you put this (toy) in your mouth you will get poisoned,” he said. “There is nothing good about the agents (in these toys) that I’m reporting to you.”

Lykissa said lead goes to the brain and causes learning disorders in children. “It’s also implicated in high instances of heart attacks. It is a very heavy metal.”

Chromium a carcinogen

Chromium, he said, is a cancer producing agent. “It can cause cancer in the bladder and kidneys, and if it’s inhaled, cause cancer in the lungs. There’s nothing good about chromium. And cadmium is a horrible thing to get into the body. It creates havoc in the joints, kidneys, and lungs.”

ExperTox’s tests on the green monster toy detected what Lykissa said are elevated levels of lead -- 907.4 micrograms per kilogram.

“That’s almost one part per million. With that kind of concentration, if a dog is chewing on it or licking it, he’s getting a good source of lead.”

The green monster toy also had what Lykissa considered high levels of chromium--334.9 micrograms per kilogram.

“With that kind of chromium in there you have what can be an extremely toxic toy if they (animals) put it in their mouths. And dogs put things in their mouths. If a dog puts this in his mouth, he runs a big chance of getting some type of metal toxicity that may shorten his life.”

Which is worse?

Which heavy metal-- chromium or lead -- poses a bigger threat to dogs?

“Toxic burden is toxic burden,” Lykissa said. “You are increasing the burden on the animal by having these in there. A dog is going to get a good dose of chromium and lead from this toy.”

The lab also detected other toxic metals in the green monster toy.

“There’s cadmium, arsenic, and mercury in there,” Lykissa said. “This is not a clean toy. This is toxic. Bank on it.” ExperTox’s tests on the catnip toy detected “concerning” levels of cadmium – 236 micrograms per kilogram.

“That one is worrisome to me,” Lykissa said. “That’s a big number. It’s a good dose of cadmium.”

There’s another reason Lykissa is concerned about the heavy metals in these chew toys.

“These (toxic) materials came off the toys freely, like with the lick of the tongue from a dog or cat,” he said. “They were readily liberated from these toys. We didn’t take a sledge hammer and pound on them. I just did what a dog or cat would do by licking it. That’s why this is so serious.”

Lykissa said toxicologists cut off a small piece from each of the toys, weighed the samples, and put them in acidic water.

“We left the samples for a while and then heated them up to body temperature,” he said. “Then we put them in a machine (called an ICP-MS- or Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry), and that machine told us this is lead and this is chromium . . .

“We didn’t dissolve the toys,” he added. “These materials were leeching off the toys. Whatever leeched off the toys is what I’m reporting to you. The material came right off. Somebody’s saliva or the sweat in their hands would freely pick up these materials. And that’s absorbing it. If you ate the materials, like a dog might, it would be worse.”

Lykissa said he wasn’t surprised to find these levels of toxic materials in the toys.

“I knew where they came from – China. And anything from there seems to be made using very old manufacturing processes that are ripe with these types of problems. Unfortunately, it’s becoming routine in my business to see these types of results (on products made in China).

“But we better be worried,” he said of lab’s findings. “Some of the toys you had were clean, like the hedgehog and the plastic dumbbell. They had small amounts of cadmium. But then you look at that catnip toy and it has 236 (micrograms per kilograms) of cadmium. That’s something that somebody out there ought to be worried about. In my business, if you’re going to sit there and let dogs and cats play with a toy that has heavy metals freely released from it -- and put it in their mouths – it becomes a concern.”

Veterinarians disagree

But veterinarians who reviewed ExperTox’s results disagree.

“I don’t see any of those numbers being a toxicity concern for dogs or cats,” said Dr. Mike Murphy of the University of Minnesota’s College of Veterinary Medicine. “Latex paint can contain one-half to one percent of lead, which is 10,000 parts per million. What he (Dr. Lykissa) is saying is that one part per million is a risk. But latex paint is 10,000 times higher than that and we don’t recognize latex paint as a toxicity risk to dogs and cats.

“I disagree with the interpretation that’s being made (by Lykissa),” added Dr. Murphy, who holds a Ph.D. in toxicology. “I consider these to be extremely low numbers and they are not a toxicological concern for pet owners.”

Dr. Fred Oehme at Kansas State University’s College of Veterinary Medicine said the risks to dogs and cats from these toys depends on how much of the heavy metals are absorbed in their bodies.

“Could they be harmful? The poisoning depends on how much is taken into their systems. Most animals require 30 parts per million of their total daily diet before you get into a problem with lead. Cadmium is more than that.”

Should pet owners be wary of these toys?

“I think they’re a potential hazard – just like a car can be a potential hazard,” said Dr. Oehme, a professor of toxicology, pathobiology, medicine, and physiology. “The hazard in this case implies how the compound is being used and its availability.

“I’m more concerned about the lead than the other two (heavy metals),” he added. “Lead accumulates and if it gets into the body, it builds up.”

Governmental inaction

ConsumerAffairs.com contacted the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) about Expertox’s findings. A spokeswoman said the FDA does not regulate toys for pets, and she is not aware of any governmental agency with regulatory power over these products.

What about the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC)?

“Although it’s not in the fine print, the CPSC will regulate pet toys as they assume those toys would come in contact with children,” according to a spokeswoman for the American Pet Product Manufacturers Association (APPMA).

We shared ExperTox’s test results with APPMA --a non-profit trade group that represents more than 900 pet product makers. The group’s president, however, was unavailable for comment.

We also contacted the CPSC last week and today, but the agency has not responded to our inquiries.

Pet owners irate

Meanwhile, a pet owner who read our report says the public should stop buying Chinese-made toys for their dogs and cats.

“The recent story that came out in ConsumerAffairs.com about pet toys from China purchased at Wal-Mart containing lead and other toxins is the 'tip of the iceberg',” said Kathy K. of Northville, Michigan.

“It is likely that most pet toys from China contain things that are bad for our pets -- just as so many things from China are bad for humans. We have decided not to purchase any more pet toys made in China. We think everyone should pay more attention to this and refuse to purchase any pet toys that are made in China!”

Kathy said her family’s dog became sick after playing with a chew toy made in China.

“Our Boston Terrier kept throwing up and we finally narrowed it down to the toy squirrel we had purchased for her,” she said, adding her family buys most of its dog’s toys at PetSmart. “After looking at the label and noting it was ‘Made in China’ we then looked at all the other pet toys we've purchased. Every single one said ‘Made in China.’

“Once we took the toy squirrel away from her toy box, she stopped throwing up,” Kathy added. “We tried giving it back to her and she started throwing up again . . . pet toys from China are harming and perhaps killing our pets. More studies and investigations into pet toys made in China should be performed and warnings should go out to the general public to beware.”

PetSmart tests

A spokesman for PetSmart told us today that his company appreciates customers’ concerns about the safety of the toys they give their dogs and cats.

That’s why PetSmart routinely tests its toys for toxins.

“We do a lot of random testing of toys and other products,” said Bruce Richardson, the company’s director of external communications. “And to my knowledge we have never found any issues relative to this -- particularly with lead -- with the levels being above the ones established by the government. They fall well below those levels.”

He added: “We expect that the people who are providing us with supplies -- our vendors and manufacturers -- are meeting U.S. governmental regulations. But in addition to that, we randomly pick toys for dogs and cats and test them for lead and other toxins.”

ConsumerAffairs.com randomly chose the four Chinese-made pet toys we hired ExperTox to test.

We took that action after Doris B. of Columbus, Georgia, contacted us in late August with concerns about possible toxins in chew toys.

“There is a lot of public outcry (and rightly so) over the Menu Foods and Mattel toy recalls,” she told us. “One overlooked area is the pet toy industry. It seems like every cat toy, dog toy, etc. says ‘made in China.’ Has anyone tested these things to see if they are safe for our pets to chew?”

Doris said she’s horrified by ExperTox’s results—even though she doesn’t have a dog or cat. Her pet is a ferret.

“These lab results are very disturbing. If I had a dog or cat, I would be mad as H-E-L-L.

“I had a sneaking suspicion this was the way it was going to come down,” she added. “We’ve had these pet food recalls and the (melamine-tainted) ingredients came from China. And the children’s toys that have been recalled were also made in China.”

But pet owners shouldn’t be the only ones alarmed by ExperTox’s findings, Doris said. Parents should be worried, too.

“There are children playing with their pets and their pets’ toys,” she said, “and sometimes small children will put their pet’s toys in their mouths.

“Somebody ought to care enough to do something about this.”



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

July 20 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts

Print, mail, etc.






FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.



Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Rogues Gallery | Good Guys | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | Search | Video | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds | Radio | Job Postings




Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.