|
CONSUMER NEWS RECALLS COMPLAINT FORM SCAM ALERTS |
| Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish | |
|
|
![]() |
How Consumers Miscalculate Sale Prices"Double discount" can make savings look unrealistically large |
||||||
|
September 17, 2007
Consumers often mistakenly think the total discount is 45% off the original price when, in fact, the true discount is 40%. A new study from the October issue of the Journal of Consumer Research explores why consumers frequently think a double discount is a better deal than a single discount of the same total magnitude. “Retailers frequently use the strategy of double discounts for their regular promotions or to induce customers to open a credit card account with them. Such errors in peoples’ judgments of the net effect of multiple price discounts . . . have implications for a variety of marketing settings including advertising, promotion, pricing, and public policy,” write Haipeng (Allan) Chen of the University of Miami and Akshay R. Rao of the University of Minnesota. Prior studies have shown that even math teachers frequently have trouble calculating percentages. In the first experiment, the researchers found that 59 percent of the respondents -- students at a large university -- erroneously added the two percentages to calculate the overall discount. Only 26 percent of students got the answer right. As not everyone was prone to the miscalculation effect, the researchers then sought to identify the situations that help counter calculation error. They first gave incentives to one group of participants, offering $2 for correct answers. The rate of computational error was 26 percent, compared with 44 percent for students who were not offered money for correct answers. Participants were also less prone to computational error when the problems were easier or the results seemingly illogical. Students presented with a base price of $100 from which to calculate the double discount were less likely to make an error than students presented with a base price of $80. Similarly, the researchers asked participants to calculate either a double percentage decrease of 70% and 45% or a price increase of the same percentages. Those who mistakenly added the figures in the decrease condition were confronted with a decrease of 115%, and were more likely to make errors than those confronted with a 115% increase (explained as a change in gasoline prices). “Since this computational error can potentially influence peoples’ judgment in a variety of settings, the economic impact of such errors on consumer welfare may be substantial,” Chen and Rao write. The researchers also point to policy implications of computational error outside of consumer settings, such as when a 70% increase followed by a 60% decrease in statewide test scores is considered positive, even though the net effect on test scores is a 32% decrease. Report Your Experience
|
||||||
Back to the top | |
|||||||
Advertisement
|
Home |
Rogues Gallery |
Good Guys |
Complaint Form |
News |
Recalls |
Search |
Video |
FAQ |
|
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. |