CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

AT&T Agrees to New Stolen Cell Phone Rules

Other states, companies may adopt California pact





October 10, 2007 

AT&T
Slamming
Long Distance
Local
Wireless
Broadband
Telemarketers
---
News
AT&T Agrees to Refund Some Ringtone Charges
States Asked to Probe AT&T U-Verse Explosions
AT&T Exits Pay Phone Business
AT&T Changes Contract Policy
AT&T Changes Terms Of Service After Outcry
AT&T Agrees to New Stolen Cell Phone Rules
AT&T Stiffens Language Covering Objectionable Content
AT&T Adds Parental Controls To Mobile Phones
AT&T Slammed Over Rebate Policies
Appeals Court Shreds AT&T Arbitration Clause
Court OKs Rebate Lawsuit against Cingular/AT&T
AT&T Trashes Cingular Brand
AT&T Offers Net Neutrality Concessions To Win Merger Approval
FCC Delays Decision On AT&T/BellSouth Deal
Justice Department Green Lights AT&T-BellSouth Merger
FCC Clears the Way for AT&T-BellSouth Merger
AT&T Trumpets New TV Service
AT&T Web Site Hacked; Customer Data Exposed
AT&T Sues Calling Record Brokers
AT&T Declares Consumers' Personal Data "Corporate Property"
AT&T Plans to Kill Cingular Name
Report: AT&T Acquiring BellSouth
SBC Recast as AT&T
FCC approves AT&T, MCI Deals
Justice Dept. OKs AT&T, MCI Sell-Outs
SBC Will Keep AT&T Name
Consumer Groups Oppose Big Telco Mergers
SBC Buys AT&T
AT&T Will Pay Refunds to New Yorkers
AT&T Will Pull Out of 7 States
AT&T Teams With Sprint to Return to Wireless Business
Minnesota Sues AT&T
Class Action Charges AT&T With Slamming
Another AT&T Rate Hike
AT&T Hiking Minimum Fees
AT&T Faces $780,000 Do-Not-Call Fine
AT&T Will Run Do-Not-Call List
Supreme Court Denies AT&T's Appeal of Arbitration Ruling

In an agreement with California Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr., AT&T Mobility has agreed not to charge customers for calls made after their cell phones are lost or stolen.

"This groundbreaking settlement makes AT&T the first cell phone company that has agreed to protect its customers from cell phone rip-offs and other unauthorized uses," Brown said. "It is now time for the rest of the cell phone industry to step forward and follow AT&T's example."

Brown had alleged that the company violated California law, including Public Utilities Code section 2890, which bars phone companies from charging customers for unauthorized services.

"No cell phone company should profit from calls made by thieves or unauthorized users," Brown said.

The Attorney General's Office began the investigation in 2006 after several consumers complained they were being charged thousands of dollars for calls made on cell phones that were stolen. In one case, calls originated from Mexico, a country the customer had never visited.

Although customers could fully document that the calls were unauthorized, AT&T refused to credit the accounts.

The agreement requires the company to credit a customer's bill or immediately investigate customer reports that the calls were made after the phone was lost or stolen. The company may only charge a customer if an investigation determines that the customer actually authorized the charges.

The judgment requires AT&T Mobility to inform each of their customers of their legal rights regarding lost or stolen phones. Under the agreement, AT&T must either credit the disputed charges or inform customers of their legal rights which include:

• The right to have the case investigated within 30 days

• The right to provide information showing a customer did not authorize= the calls

• The right not to pay disputed charges during the investigation=20

• The right to appeal the outcome of an investigation to the California= Public Utilities Commission.

AT&T must notify customers--in writing--of these new requirements and assist customers to obtain credit for amounts already paid on lost or stolen phones, back to year 2003.

AT&T will also pay the Attorney General's Office $500,000 for costs of the investigation and for the Unfair Competition Law Fund, administered by the California District Attorneys Association.

The California law for cell phones is similar to that for credit cards: customers have a right to dispute unauthorized charges and request an investigation. Customers should not be held responsible for charges until the investigation concludes, Brown said.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

August 29 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts



FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.





Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds |


Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.