CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Connecticut Files Antitrust Suit Against Reinsurance Broker

Illegal actions inflated consumers' premiums by 40%, state charges



October 10, 2007

Insurance Probe
KickbacksConnecticut Files Antitrust Suit Against Reinsurance Broker
The Hartford Settles Illegal Trading Charges
Zurich American Implements Reforms, Pays Consumers Millions
Liberty Mutual Sued in Bid-Rigging Investigation
Insurance Executives Indicted for Bid Rigging, Fraud
Aon Settles For $190 Million
Marsh & McLennan to Pay $850 Million
Universal Life Settles with California
Florida Subpoenas Insurers
Zurich American Insurance Executives Plead Guilty
NY Insurance Broker Charged With Fraud, Antitrust Violations
Fremont Investment Advisors Settle Market Timing Case
Florida Opens Insurance Probe
Oregon Joins Insurance Probe
California Joins Insurance Crackdown
Widespread Insurance Corruption, NY Charges

Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal has filed an antitrust lawsuit against one of the world's largest reinsurance brokers for anticompetitive practices that he says illegally inflated insurance costs for insurance companies and consumers nationwide.

"Thousands of consumers in Connecticut and many more in most states across the country paid premiums up to 40 percent higher, costing them potentially hundreds of millions of dollars," Blumenthal said.

"We are drawing back the cloak of secrecy on industry practices that inflated prices and profits at the expense of 170 insurance companies and their customers. Our investigation is active and ongoing."

Blumenthal's lawsuit reveals a series of alleged conspiracies within the reinsurance industry, principally led by defendant broker Guy Carpenter & Company, LLC, an international reinsurance broker based in New York.

Guy Carpenter essentially created markets that - in its own words - were "insulated from competition."

Conspiring with numerous reinsurers to exploit its position as a dominant reinsurance broker, Guy Carpenter fixed prices, shut out competitors, manipulated the markets and substantially increased profits in the lucrative reinsurance market, Blumenthal charged.

The lawsuit also names reinsurer Excess Reinsurance Company, a company that Guy Carpenter funneled business to, despite its ownership interest in the company. It names nine other coconspirators.

"Guy Carpenter served as ringleader in choreographing the reinsurance market to fix prices, stifle competitors and collect excessive profits at the expense of an entire industry," Blumenthal said. "My antitrust investigation has revealed an industry plagued by pervasive anticompetitive and anti-consumer practices. Guy Carpenter's schemes were enabled by a shifting coterie of more than 20 coconspirators - reinsurers willing to play Guy Carpenter's game of deceit, and damage consumers.

"This company and its coconspirators created an illusion of competition - a faux functioning market. They raised costs for insurance companies, which ultimately were paid by businesses, homeowners and taxpayers - almost anyone or any entity that buys insurance.

"We began an aggressive investigation after insurers in Connecticut and nationwide sought to impose unconscionable and unacceptable burdens on consumers, particularly along coastal areas. Our investigation has revealed a system of cascading costs resulting from illegal price fixing arrangements in the reinsurance industry that created a complete vacuum of competition.

"Reinsurance is essentially a completely unregulated business, where backroom deals abound. Guy Carpenter's illegal agreements are akin to the illegal trusts that existed over 100 years ago - spurring enactment of our nation's antitrust laws. We will fight vigorously for both court remedies and reforms in industry practices that have harmed consumers at every level."

Guy Carpenter allegedly funneled lucrative business to select inner circles of reinsurers - or "facilities" - in exchange for excessive fees and other benefits from these reinsurers.

Reinsurers included in these facilities agreed not to compete against the prices and terms set by Guy Carpenter or another "lead reinsurer" and instead agreed to be bound by the same prices and terms as the other participants.

If a reinsurer was unwilling to "play ball," as Guy Carpenter put it, that reinsurer was foreclosed access to potential reinsurance business that it was otherwise willing to compete for and write.

Because of the unregulated nature of the reinsurance industry, Guy Carpenter's dominant position in the market and the inertia inherent in the industry, Guy Carpenter maintained these conspiracies virtually undetected for almost 50 years, Blumenthal said.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

July 6 2008

Print, mail, etc.


Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts

FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.

Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Rogues Gallery | Good Guys | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | Search | Video | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds | Radio | Job Postings




Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.