NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS   RESOURCES  
Small Claims Guide   Class Actions   Lemon Laws   FAQ   Newsletters  
Share


Complain about a product or service

Automotive    Education    Employment    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Insurance    Pets    Shopping    Travel     Print This     Email This    



NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Magazine Finds Lead in Maxi Toy Blocks

Toy company tries to block publication of findings





By James R. Hood
ConsumerAffairs.com

October 19, 2007     Spanish
A Canadian consumer magazine, Protégez-Vous, reports that tests of Mega Bloks plastic building blocks found lead levels that exceeded the 600 parts per million (ppm) safety standard that is in effect in both Canada and the U.S.

Mega Brands, the Montreal-based manufacturer of the blocks, went to court to seek an injunction barring publication of the article, but was unsuccessful, The New York Times reported. Mega, Canada's largest toy manufacturer, denies its toys contain dangerous levels of lead.

It was a "total shock," when independent tests found lead in 32 tested toys, three of which had lead above recommended levels, including Mega Bloks Maxi System, a set of plastic building blocks, said Marie-Josee Boudreau, an engineer who conducted the lead tests included in Canada's annual toy survey, the Montreal Gazette reported.

Without a doubt, Boudreau said, any amount of lead found in children's toys is of major concern to parents. The Canadian agency Option Consommateurs tests toys each year and reports on their suitability and safety.

Mega Brands had to recall millions of Magnetix construction sets last year and again this year. One death and 27 injuries to children were reported in the U.S., caused when toddlers swallowed small parts and magnets bunched together, causing intestinal obstructions.

Types of tests


California Warns Retailers On Lead
Mattel Settles Suits Over Dangerous Toys
Target To Pay $600,000 For Violating Lead Paint Ban
Tougher Safety Requirements For Children's Products Now In Effect
Toys 'R' Us Launches Unsafe Baby Products Awareness Program
New Safety Agency Chief Pledges Greater Openness
Obama Names New Consumer Product Safety Chair, Boosts Budget
Toymaker Fined $1.1 Million For Consumer Violations
Maryland Stores Stop Selling Toys With Lead Paint
Toymakers, Craftspeople Up In Arms Over New Safety Law
Thrift Stores Protest Ban on Lead Toys
Target Launches In-Store Recall System
Do's and Don'ts of Holiday Decorating
New Jersey Finds Recalled Toys in Four Stores
Mattel Agrees to Lower Lead Paint Levels in Toys
Consumers Cautioned About Dangerous Toys
Soon-To-Be-Banned Plastic Toys Flooding the Market
Safety Agency Warns of Safety Hazards in Cribs
---
More Consumer Safety News
Recall Notices

The dispute centers around the type of tests used by the independent lab that performed the tests for Protégez-Vous and those commonly used by toy manufacturers and the government agencies that are supposed to be ensuring toys are safe.

The lab hired by the magazine used a "total lead test," in which plastic was scraped off 32 toys, dissolved in acid and then analyzed, published reports said.

When the results came back, a yellow Maxi block was the only toy that exceeded the 600 ppm standard. Blue and red blocks showed no lead, the magazine said.

Lead is sometimes used in plastics because makes yellow and red colors brighter.

The test normally used by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), Health Canada and most toy manufacturers is called a "migration test," which measures how much lead comes off an item -- as opposed to how much lead it actually contains.

In the migration test, vinegar or a similar substance is left on the toy's surface for a pre-determined period of time, then analyzed to see how much lead it absorbed.

Consumers Union has been encouraging U.S. regulators to switch to total lead tests for all products used by children, saying they more accurately reflect the way that children interact with toys and other products.

Canadian safety officials said their tests, using the migration method, found no lead in the blocks.

“When we got word that there could be a problem with the product, out of safety concerns for Canadians we tested them on our own and we found no lead,” said Joey Rathwell, a spokesman for Health Canada.

“Preliminary results from Health Canada's Product Safety Laboratory indicate no quantifiable total lead content in the plastic of the Mega Blocks Maxi System product,” the department said in a formal statement.

In the Magnetix case, a California family whose four-year-old son ingested parts of Magnetix-brand building sets allege that they warned the manufacturer about the product weeks before another child died in a similar incident.

In a lawsuit filed in Shasta County Superior Court in Redding, Calif., Adam and Sara Finley, whose four-year-old son William required emergency intestinal surgery in August 2005 after swallowing Magnetix magnets, sued Livingston, N.J.-based RoseArt Inc., its parent company, Mega Bloks Inc. of Canada, and Toys R Us.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.

Share

Follow us on Twitter.

FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!





CONSUMER NEWS

SAFETY RECALLS

Back to the top |

Advertisement


Custom Search
AUTOMOTIVE
• Dealers
• Manufacturers
• Service
• Extended Warranties
• Lemon Laws
• Recalls
• Tires
• Transporters

FAMILY
• Aging
• Children, Parenting
• Recalls
• Dating
• Education
• Entertainment
• Pets
• Weddings
FINANCE
• Annuities
• Banks
• Credit Cards
• Debt Collection
• Debt Counseling
• Insurance
• Investing
• Loans
• Mortgages
• Payday Loans
• Student Loans
• Tax Prep

HEALTH
• Doctors
• Drugs, Pharmacies
• Health Clubs
• Hearing Care
• Hospitals
• Nursing Homes
• Nutrition, Diets
• Vision Care
• Weight Loss
HOUSE & HOME
• Appliances
• Cookware
• Furniture
• Home Improvements
• Lawn & Garden
• Movers
• Pools & Spas
• Realtors, Rental Agents
• Recalls
• Utilities

ELECTRONICS
• Cable TV/DBS
• Cameras
• Cell Phones
• Computers
• Home Electronics
• Internet Access
• Local Phone Service
• Long Distance
• VoIP
SHOPPING
• In-Home
• Online
• Retail Stores
• Sporting Goods
• Supermarkets
• Telemarketers

TRAVEL
• Airlines
• Bus Lines
• Car Rental
• Cruises
• Hotels
• Travel Agents
• Trains

RESOURCES
• Class Actions
• Complaint Form
• Small Claims Guide
• Lemon Laws
CONSUMER NEWS
• Latest News
• Automotive
• Telecom
• Financial
• Health
• Homeowners
• Scams
• Seniors
• Travel
• More ...

RECALLS
• Automotive
• Children's Products
• Drugs
• Food
• Household Products
• Sporting Goods

ABOUT US
• FAQ
• Privacy Policy
• Advertise With Us
• Newsroom
• Syndication
• Terms of Use

Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.